Iceman

Anyways, that’s how i killed my daughter.

You can just say Russia you know.

Alright. Consider it done and now your response is some sort of recognition that that what i said is the case but this well established, hundreds of years old field of political theory is devilish trick by our enemies to devise us. Which does nothing to strengthen your shallow view on national sovereignty.

As already hinted at: Political Realism is a fucking theory of international relations. It’s used to explain things in reality. So you have to understand that it’s true for every hegemonic power. It’s not unique to Russia. Do you think that the US lead invasion of Afghanistan was respecting their sovereignty? They had no obligation to extradite Bin Laden and we got to see what it meant to not dance to their pipe. The list can go on ad nauseam, we have a couple of thousand years of ‘whatabouts’ here. There is no need to pretend that this is some weird trick of our enemies to divide and fool you, it’s an observable fact about international politics. And it absolutely does you no favors to have this self-sealing mind in the face of it. Weaker nations have always, and will continue, to curtail their own sovereign choices in favor of navigating the interests of greater powers and kept as much sovereignty as they can. Sure they have the radical free will to do anything, but in reality things happens as a result… even if you don’t like it. And hence a field of science to understand this process, that looks a-moral due to a lack of having it observed.

Heck, I see that you sort of get the principles of the political theory. As you said, it’s in the west interest to not have Russia attack her neighbors. So it manages to describe both Russias actions and the West response to it. It will even describe the limits of our support.

So a better counter to “bUt UkRaInE pRoVoKeD RuSsIa” is to say yes, but I want a want a weak Russia.

Which is fundamental misunderstanding of international politics according to Political Realism. Hegemonic powers never care about these de jure arguments anyway and will practicality always act in accordance to int’s own intressets, leaving weaker nations to navigate it.

He turned around and saw the future. In his final moments he knew what what was happening to him. He just might have briefly felt the angst he caused so many when they where told that he would let them die while he kept their money.

DENTAL PLAN

It’s a bigger whip to keep the proles heads bent.

No.i meant Vocel, as in voluntary celibate. Sort of the inverse of the incels.

White liberals women are going volcel until the Conservatives change their ways!

I’m going ahead and this dismissing this out of hand. It’s not a thing outside of there curiosity articles and niche circles that have sort of read a bout the SCUM-manifest and so on.

You can easily say the same thing. Use the image identification to get a name of the plant and google it to read about checking if the sessile is leafy or no.

As if these temporary rules will just not be permanent when the storm has blown over.

The office of sign approval is conveniently indisposed, sorry no signs on your demonstration :(

Stop eating L’s as if it’s reasonable.