Ensign_Crab

Already voted for Harris.

You just want critics of genocide to shut up and be as happy as you are about it.

I already voted for Harris. I do not believe she will move on this issue, unless it’s to the right.

Democrats could have passed the John Lewis Voting Rights Act to restore voting protections. But the Jim Crow Filibuster was more important.

I want the genocide to end now. You keep pretending it’s not a genocide.

I wrote that the war should end and you suggest I will only be satisfied if all Palestinians are killed.

That is one way for the genocide to end.

So one piece of well-placed libel that isn’t enough by itself to incur moderation.

Ignoring it lets the libel stand. Ignoring it enough turns the libel into accepted wisdom. Reporting it does nothing because it’s not enough by itself. Engaging with it results in repetition of the libel. Few cycles of that, slapfight ban.

So all you need to get a temp ban on someone you disagree with is to make a burner account and provoke them into a slapfight?

https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/03/1147976

https://jewishcurrents.org/a-textbook-case-of-genocide

https://www.bu.edu/articles/2024/is-israel-committing-genocide-in-gaza/

Let’s not pretend that there is anything other than the complete slaughter of all Palestinians that will satisfy you. Or your definition of genocide.

14 PAGES of dead INFANTS. Or as you call anyone who Netanyahu murders for you, “terrorists.”

https://www.commondreams.org/news/rashida-tlaib-gaza-children

Here’s something for you to not read, like you didn’t read my comment about 14 pages of dead Palestinian infants the first time, and like you didn’t read how I told you to not pollute my inbox with your disgusting genocide apologia again.

Then again, your opinions weren’t reached by reading, it’s why you’re a genocide denier.

You’re making an ethical argument, and drag already 100% agrees with you ethically.

I doubt that.

If you want to disagree with drag, try making a legal argument.

I did. You ignored it more than once. It’s why I doubt your agreement with my ethical argument.