π²πππππππ πΌπππ
Hereβs an article with some examples: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/gaza-nakba-israels-far-right-palestinian-fears-hamas-war-rcna123909
Examples include:
- Inflicting a new Nakba
- Dropping a nuclear bomb on Gaza
- Creation of βsterile zonesβ on the west bank
The EU has even been considering sanctioning some of these ministers for hate speech. So please, try and keep up.
Put it in rice overnight. It will attract asian people who will fix it right up.
For real though, donβt put it in rice. Small rice particles can get stuck in your device and cause damage.
I probably change the brightness setting the most. Why is it all the way at the top of the settings, the furthest out of reach it could be?
Thatβs what I do, I dismiss the claim. But just because their claim doesnβt make sense to me I wonβt assume they are wrong.
If you still assume that the claim might have merit, you explicitly havenβt dismissed the claim. You may not live like it might be true, but if you donβt assume itβs wrong either you havenβt really dismissed it.
If something doesnβt make sense to me, doesnβt mean that thing doesnβt make sense. If something makes sense to me, it doesnβt mean it makes sense.
You donβt have to consider all things you do not understand to be false. You have to ask yourself if something could be true. This involves a number of subquestions, one of which might be βdoes this make sense to meβ, but it doesnβt have to be the defining factor. Quantum mechanics doesnβt make a whole lot of sense to most people, but you donβt see a mass rejection of QM for that reason.
I just feel my place in the universe is pretty far away from absolute truths. I prefer the humble route of just saying βI just donβt really know, do Iβd rather not believe based on emotions or shallow perceptionsβ.
You might argue humble, I might argue a sense of naivety. Thereβs a whole lot of things we can say about the universe with pretty absolute certainty. For the concept of god, we have about zero reasons to assume he exists and a whole lot of reasons why he probably doesnβt. In that situation I canβt in good conscience maintain the position that science is wrong about everything and god does exist. The dismissal of evidence pointing towards the absense of a god comes across to me as arrogance rather than humility, though Iβm fairly certain thatβs not where your position comes from.
Did you try the thought experiment? What things do you know? What constitutes the line of knowing vs believing for you? Would you believe that an alien version of RuPaul could be at the center of the moon, because we havenβt checked there? Would you consider it even possible or would you dismiss the claim? And if you dismiss it, what makes this claim truly any different from the claim that god might exist?