Just do long as they don’t flock to Nestlé
Nestlé is a Swiss company. Given how much they have their fingers in the global food production and trade, i wouldn’t be surprised if McDonalds and Coca Cola also source some of their ingredients from companies affiliated with Nestlé
Kinda irrelevant in the context of boycotting all three but they do:
(I found this moderately interesting: the three toppings are from three different food conglomerates, Kitkat from Nestlé, M&Ms from Mars, and Daim from Mondelez. And in truth, none of those deserve really your business.)
It’s about breaking habits.
And that can be difficult, especially if it’s not a conscious habit. I noticed that when I canceled amazon and audible and chatgpt, etc.
How is ChatGPT already such a habit? What are you people prompting about all day? I am genuinely curious.
It turned into my replacement of Google for shallow questions.
I now use leChat which has less intelligence but more crisp unemotional up to date information.
I also use it for most texts as spellcheck or feedback.
Right now I’m using it as a step by step guide to figure out why I am failing to install Ubuntu on wsl to try it out. Not quite working yet though.
I see. I think I‘ll be sticking to different search engines for now. Maybe I‘ll check out leChat or something similar when nothing comes up. Though most search engines will give you AI answers already anyway and they‘re not really helpful in my experience. My browser already has a spellchecker so I‘m good on that front too.
It turned into my replacement of Google for shallow questions.
Might be worth keeping in mind that AI-tools 1) consume huge amounts of electricity and 2) tend to hallucinate.
Why it’s not great:
1) is self-explanatory.
While 2) isn’t relevant for creative tasks, it is problematic when you expect facts. Unless you know the answer yourself, you can’t be sure the AI hasn’t just given you some bullshit, even if it’s only about spellchecking.
I believe it but reporting was done based on a single internet survey with self reported answers.
Ifop study for NYC.eu*** ***conducted by online self-administered questionnaire from 14 to 17 March 2025 among a representative national sample of 1,000 people, representative of the French population aged 18 and over.
If it was a random representative sample, what difference does it make that it was conducted online?
I was wondering how did they measure economic impact this fast, hence I was interested in the source of this claim. People lie in surveys and say things that make them look better, even anonymously. A lot of modern speech is aspirational in general - we say things we want to be true but aren’t necessarily true, wishing them into existence.
By this argument, we should never trust any survey outcome because we can never be 100% sure that no one lied. Even in personal interviews, people can lie.
Maybe I missed the point?
Of course they’re free to not join, but I struggle to understand how McDonalds can be the cheapest alternative? I don’t think it is at all here in Sweden at least, not even close.
Yup. As a French dude I don’t see how what they say is true. Typical teenager bullshit to me. You can get much better food for less. On top of the list, students have access to unviersity restaurant where based on income you can pay 1 to 3.30 euros for a complete meal.
I guess these guys also spend a lot on bars in the evening.
On the rainy Grands Boulevards in Paris on Friday, the branches of McDonald’s and KFC were doing brisk business.
There was little sign of “le boycott” – a movement among French customers to reject American brands and products made in the US, in protest at Donald Trump’s trade tariffs and anti-Europe rhetoric.