40 points

🍉🤭 🌻

permalink
report
reply
29 points

🍉🤭 🌻

🍉🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭

⌛️🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Wait, this is allowed?

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Nope, poisoning food and water is a war crime but who cares if only ruskies have ended dead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It is only a war crime if it is systematically carried out by the military in a campaign (See: Ruzzias attacks on hospitals and civilians).

If it was carried out by civilians its just a lesson on how you could have just stayed home and eat non-poisoned fruit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

No, civilians could be charged for war crimes. Nazis like Martin Borman and Julius Streigher were civilians charged for war crimes. Nevertheless the truth is on our side, russians should all rot and die in pain

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Wait, this is allowed?

Not by Russian laws but who cares about those.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

This appears to be done by civilians remaining in occupied territory

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

It’s not a war crime of the people poisoning the fruit are not combatants. They could probably be tried for manslaughter, and I doubt Russia would be very lenient.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-22 points

People don’t get a ‘get out of war crimes’ card by not being officially in the military. If they purposefully took hostile action in the conflict they’re combatants, uniformed or not. The use of poison is a war crime.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

It’s not a war crime if it’s done against rusnya, don’t you get get it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Not all war crimes are actually bad when committed against worse war criminals in self-defense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

Yes they do. This act falls under the purview of civilian enforcement. It is up to the controlling government to prosecute these civilian crimes in civilian criminal court.

EDIT: Okay, so this particular argument irked me so I investigated. Unfortunately, Ninja is technically correct. According to the ICRC civilians receive an instantaneous removal of their status as non-combatant for the duration of the hostile act, and the ICC’s Rome Statutes clearly list using poison as a warcrime so it is probable the perpetrators could be prosecuted. More likely, however, is that their being subject to civilians laws means they can ALSO be prosecuted in the civilian manner. Double the risk for the reward.

That said. Russia wants to FAFO that’s their problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

So if someone occupies your house, you’ll serve cookies & cream?

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

When the Russians use rape as a weapon, I cheer on the locals in occupied areas serving poisoned fruit

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Fuckem.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

oof

permalink
report
reply
4 points

I believe they call that the watermelon crawl.

permalink
report
reply

Ukraine

!ukraine@sopuli.xyz

Create post

News and discussion related to Ukraine

🇺🇦 Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🤢No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

💥Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules
  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

Donate to support Ukraine’s Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


Community stats

  • 3.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.6K

    Posts

  • 13K

    Comments