The Portuguese Air Force is no longer expected to acquire the 5th generation F-35 fighter from Lockheed Martin, all due to the review of the US position towards NATO.

175 points

hey guys, I think that trump guy might just be really awful for America.

permalink
report
reply
35 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Noggles

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah. We know. Others are going ro find out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

I’m assuming because American arms dealers like Lockheed Martin are losing a ton of business and America is rapidly losing the soft power and influence its build over the past 80 years

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Why is that a bad thing ?

permalink
report
parent
reply
82 points

Love to see it

permalink
report
reply
79 points

If we assume that Portugal would have ordered the same number as Czechia (a fellow European country with a pretty close GDP, population, and military budget that already bought F-35s) and take the flyaway cost on wikipedia of $82.500,000 as the price Portugal would have paid per plane, that’s $2 billion in sales that Lockheed Martin doesn’t get

permalink
report
reply
66 points

that’s $2 billion in sales that Lockheed Martin doesn’t get

And that’s just the beginning.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

I feel like billionaires might resolve the Trump/musk issue for us. Fucking with a defense contractor’s bottom line is pretty dangerous, especially when you have private security (Musk)

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

I feel like billionaires might resolve the Trump/musk issue for us. Fucking with a defense contractor’s bottom line is pretty dangerous, especially when you have private security (Musk)

Honestly, I feel it’s more likely to display how much the defense industry is just another ordinary industry. They’ll whinge and wring their hands, maybe openly support the limpdick opposition if they’re feeling particularly pressured, but all that experience in making killing machines is just engineering and marketing. They’re not more likely to have clout or death squads (of their own, at least) than other major industries of comparable size and importance, and everything is structured in such a compartmentalized way that they couldn’t really leverage that against the government if they actually wanted to throw down.

The defense industry is more like the oil industry than a cyberpunk future. Influential, not independent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Fucking with a defense contractor’s

Good point. Hadn’t really thought of it that way. What an enormous mess…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

#ElbowsUp eh

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Portugal would probably have bought more, since we have a large area of the Atlantic Ocean that needs to be patrolled not only by sea, but also by air.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

You also gotta make sure nobody tries to steal the Azores for their beautiful nature.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Do they get more planes for their buck now?

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Disclaimer in that I am not in any way an expert on military procurement: it depends on what they buy.

There are three European planes that can do similar roles: the Typhoon (Anglo-German-Italian), the Rafale (French), and the Gripen (Swedish). According to this RUSI article, it looks like the Typhoon is probably actually more expensive per plane. The Typhoon was also, unlike the other two and the F-35, designed to be a pure air superiority fighter, so it’s more of an F-22 competitor than an F-35 one. Probably not what Portugal is looking for. That RUSI article has the Rafale as being a bit more expensive than the F-35 and the Gripen being a bit cheaper than it. However, the source for the F-35’s number is the flyaway cost for the Americans, who did ordered it in huge numbers and also did most (not all, but most) of the development and I would assume get a better deal than others. Further, it’s in an article headlined “F-35’s price might rise, Lockheed warns”. So I’m just going to hedge my bets and say:

  • If they buy the Typhoon, definitely no, but the Typhoon probably isn’t the right fit anyway
  • If they buy the Rafale, somewhere around the same, and it’ll still be extremely capable
  • If they buy the Gripen, yes, and it’ll still be very good but not quite individually capable as the other options
permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

A last point to consider is that the rafale is cheaper to operate than the F-35

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

That’s all well and good, but you’re also missing a critical point.

The European Union is very likely to introduce a bill that will massively subsidize purchases of local (EU) military equipment. This will make all EU alternatives much, much more attractive than F-35s.

This is a great move by the EU - it drives a lot of military spending away from the US and into the local economies, while shoring up its own security as well as preventing being at the hands of a fickle fascist for maintenance and upgrades.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

For once, our (Croatian) government lucked into making a good choice when they went with Rafales instead of F-16Vs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Thank you. This was the answer I was looking for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
71 points
*

It’s migration season, and this is only the first bird - I predict there’s more of them.

I think we have an interesting conflict of interest on the US side of the ocean: “the US military industrial complex” vs. “Trump, driving away their customers”.

permalink
report
reply
40 points

US MIC: “I wish the Feds would buy more guns and less butter.”

*monkey paw curls*

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

For them it is easier, because as I understand they didn’t sign any contract yet, just were planning to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

They went to the fighter store and all the F-35s were turned upside down.

permalink
report
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 164K

    Comments