If you want something that could fit the bill, maybe https://democracy.earth/
Seeing “blockchain” and “eradicating poverty” on the same page is ringing some serious alarm bells.
Are you sure? I don’t see anything resembling a ‘joke’ on the site and after a quick google search it seems to be a registered 501©3 organization.
What we need is techno-realism. Technology in an oppressive economic/political system will be used to achieve oppressive goals. So it’s the system that needs to be looked at, not just tech in isolation. And we should really be moving to an approach where we don’t adopt new tech unless it’s proven safe (not perfectly safe, but tolerably safe). And similarly, externalities need to be understood before mass adoption is enabled (e.g., massive power usage by shitcoins and LLMs).
It is far easier to criticize than to do.
The purity testing will continue until morale improves.
Tech that will allow to murder all Sunni combatants in the world, tech that will allow to murder all monarchs in the world, tech that will allow to murder all politicians in the biggest countries …
OK, ancap is not the left, it’s just that I feel that without ancap “balance of violence” idea there’s not much to say of the left, and with anarchist left it should kinda align.
Because I’m just not interested with the colored-hair polyamorous UBI left, if these 3 things are more important for it than what is being done for their taxes in their name.
who the fuck is the liberal hell hole the guardian think it is to take part in leftist discourse
