7 points
*

I wish there were more resources pointing out how to correctly identify things not as fallacies.

In internet arguments, every reference to a source is appeal to authority (even if it is an expert source),every analogy, metaphor, or simile is a straw man, defining anything is a “no true Scotsman” because those are the 3 that people remember.

Then the fallacy fallacy is probably the most important at all, and one of the most common when dealing with self-diagnosed “enlightened” people 😅 even without that, if you combine every fallacy on the wiki, there is almost no way to make any argument ever without fallacies. It sometimes becomes the “therapy speak” of arguments

permalink
report
reply
3 points

I’ve been thinking about that. A game would be incredibly cool.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Science Communication

!scicomm@mander.xyz

Create post

Welcome to c/SciComm @ Mander.xyz!

Science Communication



Notice Board

This is a work in progress, please don’t mind the mess.



About

Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Be kind and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.


Resources

Outreach:

Networking:



Similar Communities


Sister Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Plants & Gardening

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Memes

Community stats

  • 9

    Monthly active users

  • 67

    Posts

  • 48

    Comments