Switzerland mandates all software developed for the government be open sourced

Switzerland mandates software source code disclosure for public sector: A legal milestone

https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/collection/open-source-observatory-osor/news/new-open-source-law-switzerland

@technology@lemmy.world

#tech #libre

-4 points

And still I wonder why almost all public institutions use Micro$oft & Co…

Nothing to see here, Same BS, Laws that do nothing, See GDPR,

permalink
report
reply
16 points
*

You think GDPR does nothing?

Then you are not really qualified for the conversation until you read up on that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

🙂 The world is full of qualified professionals nowadays mate! You are one of them for sure!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I work closely with GDPR because of my job.

There’s a big difference in privacy and choice that people have today compared to just 10 years ago.

It even worked to get porn taken down of a person who didn’t want it there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
81 points

Been contracting for the Swiss government for years, namely ASTRA. They have 0 concept of how that should happen. It’s their IP, but they don’t want to take it, host it, maintain it, or do anything else with it once the project is done.

Do they just expect others to foot the bill? Sure, free GitHub exists, but everything else? Open sourcing without maintenance is abandonware and usually useless.

permalink
report
reply
98 points

In contrast, abandoned open source software can be picked up and updated by whomever gets paid to, where abandoned closed source software needs to be reimplemented from scratch at great expense to the tax payer.

Not only that, open source software can be adopted by the community (who already paid for the development through their taxes) for their own purposes. Consider for example the productivity impact on business that starts using tools that it cannot afford to develop itself.

Office things like document management, workflow management, accounting, but also tools used in the science community, transport and logistics, anything that government does is represented in some other way in society.

This is a big deal and I hope that it will reverberate across the globe and become the new normal.

Whilst we’re at it, consider the impact of open data, where government datasets are available to the community.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Whilst we’re at it, consider the impact of open data, where government datasets are available to the community

*imagines Moscow* You still would need more trees and fix old rain drain system.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Whilst we’re at it, consider the impact of open data, where government datasets are available to the community.

That sounds like it would be pretty useful to get better quality statistical research papers (well, I guess quality would depend more upon the researcher), doable by people without corporate backing.

Isn’t it already available in a lot of cases?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Here’s some of what’s happening in my country, Australia:

Not sure where Tasmania and the ACT are at, but those links are the federal and most state government data portals.

Behind that is much variety of data, from land use to baby names and everything in-between.

The Australian Bureau of Statistics has its own site:

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I’ll gladly upload my stuff into some repo they allow me to. I’ve inquired about it in the past - I wrote a piece of sw that fills a requirement hole left by a widely used SCADA tool - but they outright forbid it. That was about a year ago.

My point is less about open source and more about how they have no clue how to handle their IP even now. It’s a nice gesture at best (at least currently. Maybe there’s more on the way).

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Who is “they” in your statement?

If it’s the company who is contracted by the government, it seems obvious (to me) that the requirements to make it open source provides the push to make it public.

If it’s the government, then I don’t understand your point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Step 1: all software has to be open source

Step 2: governments, required by law, to fund FOSS projects in their tech stacks. Helped by organizations which trace project funding and lobbying to promote FOSS security by providing funding; a huge incentive to not insert malware

Step 3: coders are afforded dignity (UBI); given funds geared towards affording a maintenance team. Regardless of country of origin. Vital infrastructure is vital infrastructure. Talent is talent.

I support this move to Step 1

Where is the list of pauper gov’ts which force talent to get a job rather than be a talent and then maintain their projects with dignity!

Those jobs are mostly nonsense. Geared towards wasting our time building:

  • yet another stupid web site

  • yet another stupid smartphone app

  • yet another stupid cloud base server instance

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yup and then they move the spyware/malware/etc into a layer below where nobody knows what is inside…

How is your baseband modem in your smartphone doing, by the way?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Separated over the PCIe bus with an IOMMU between it and system memory, as well as hardware switches to disable it if I’m not reachable

I haven’t found a way to remove it entirely. It’s the only option I’ve found so far, but if you know of a better designed option, I’m certainly interested

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Used to be Lufthansa gave you toblerone

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

This doesn’t seem like a big deal?

The fact the code is open sourced is much less significant than the fact now the Swiss government will need to negotiate complete ownership of any software they commission.

That’s going to make things more expensive for them, and limit the vendors prepared to work with them.

Their systems, their call 🤷‍♂️

permalink
report
reply
2 points

the fact now the Swiss government will need to negotiate complete ownership of any software they commission.

I can’t find it

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

No, that is counter intuitive. It may appear more expensive at first, but on the long run it is a lot more cheaper. It avoid vendor lock-in, recurring increase of dev costs and licensing and lots of other plagues of closed proprietary development like blackbox development and justification of hidden complexity as a driving factor on costs. I worked with legacy closed proprietary sw development and lock-in combined with legacy complexity made man-hour costs exorbitant. These are partially solved by open-sourcing, as kicking out a team and putting a new one is easier, but most importantly transparency as a driving factor on quality of development.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

At least for ASTRA, for software developed in their projects that’s already the case. Frameworks etc. used are not covered, but all source code for PLC and SCADA are theirs and you’re required to hand over all code as part of documentation at the end. As a zip on a USB key, never to be looked at again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Wtf is even “ASTRA”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

https://www.astra.admin.ch/astra/de/home.html

The English abbreviation is in fact FEDRO.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points
*

I guess it’s not convenient to have Microsoft and Apple scan your company images and employee emails. Even take screenshots automatically if they can get away with it.

Appearently other countries are fine with this, which surprises me much more.

I guess the corpo version of windows have these sort of things turned off? But ms can turn them on whenever they want.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

This is specifically about software developer for the government. Microsoft office is then not included.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

That’s fucking amazing

permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.8K

    Posts

  • 122K

    Comments