0

Whistleblower 'would not' put family on Boeing 787 jet(www.bbc.com)

posted
by
Avatar
BuddyTheBeefalo@lemmy.ml
in
Avatar
technology@lemmy.world
5 comments
hidereport
Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
Avatar
Woozythebear@lemmy.world
0 points

Having the public lose trust in the safety of flying is absolutely not something you want to happen. This could have devastating effects and I think enough is enough and the government needs to step in and take over running the airlines. It’s too important to leave gold hoarding dragons in charge of it.

permalink
report
reply
Avatar
ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
0 points
*

Silver lining: less flights booked means less emissions for the environment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
1 point
*

That’s not a silver lining at all. Jets are actually very fuel efficient compared to driving when they’re full of passengers.

One less plane in the air could potentially mean 300+ more cars on the road. Not a great outcome.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
0 points

“If it’s Boing, I’m not going”

permalink
report
reply
Avatar
Carlcarla@lemmy.world
0 points

“Boing” is the sound the door makes when hitting the ground.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.8K

    Posts

  • 156K

    Comments

Community moderators