1 point

Electricity vs. energy. Electricity is only part of energy.

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*

Pretty ironic that it took Putin invading Ukraine to make Europe invest into renewables.

And not to save the planet but to be less dependent on energy from fossil fuels…

permalink
report
reply
2 points

I don’t like being cynical like this, but:

Putin’s war really did something for the climate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

And to celebrate that fact, Europe is joining the US in imposing massive tariffs on China’s electric vehicles and solar cells. Yay.

permalink
report
reply
-1 points
*

That’s a good thing imo. We do this so we can build up an industry for these things at home. That’s an important long term goal, too. If the last years have shown us anything it’s that being solely dependent on another state for certain critical stuff is a bad idea. And I’d say this is especially true for China.

Edit: btw German talking here, not American.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s a good thing imo. We do this so we can build up an industry for these things at home.

Unfortunately, most countries haven’t really done much to invest into the production of solar cells in their home country in the last twenty years (Germany is a noteworthy exception), so why would they start now?

Realistically, imposing tariffs on chinese PV cells will only slow the energy transition, instead of building up domestic production.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Gandalf, hast du gerade auf nen 2 Monate alten Beitrag von mir geantwortet? :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Do you want to know how many cars in China are from European car manufacturers?

Rebalancing trade is not some big bogeyman.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I largely welcome restricting massproduced mobile surveillance machines made by a chinese hq’d company. Don’t misunderstand me I hate teslas too for this, but we don’t need more of this shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

We are not restricting the surveillance, just making it more expensive.

What we need is forced inspections of the source code and other ways to actually mitigate the security risks.

Just making things more expensive does nothing to mitigate actual the risk.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I suppose greenwashing works? in the sense creates favorable stats, not that it helps the environment.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

You really don’t like to admit even the smallest bit of positive news, do you?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Liek the other commenter said, this could be read as 70% of electricity still relyingnon non renewables, which is a bad metric.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Reasonable people understand that transition is not an overnight process. Also adoption isn’t linear which is why they say the first third is the biggest half.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Obviously I don’t see this as good news because I can’t see how ecology and capitalism can work together, unless it is greenwashing. Environmentalism/ecology/etc want sustainability, capitalism is all about eternal growth of the business, and I don’t see corporations and other financial entities changing their business model? Do you?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Capitalism is helping destroy fossil fuels. Solar and hydro electricity is cheaper than fossil fuels.

Government subsidies - interference with he capitalist market - are propping up the oil industry (and the meat industry, while we’re at it).

Properly regulated capitalism is perfectly capable of fixing the climate crisis. Ecology and capitalism work together when going green is cheaper than using fossil fuels.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 4.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.2K

    Posts

  • 10K

    Comments