117 points

WTH, Mozilla 🤦🏼‍♀️

Also, fuck you, dude:

One Mozilla developer claimed that explaining PPA would be too challenging, so they had to opt users in by default.

permalink
report
reply
94 points

“You’re too dumb to understand so we make decisions for you”

Fuck that condescending prick with a pineapple.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Chill; he’s probably not talking about you. He is talking about “your mom”. If you want her to use Firefox, it’s got to be simple.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Opt-in IS simple. Mom just won’t opt in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

But this PPA stuff doesn’t need to be enabled by default. They are opting-in all Firefox users to something they don’t understand.

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points
*

I think explaining a system like PPA would be a difficult task.

IMO that just means they barely understand it themselves. Anyone that understands something with an amount of proficiency can explain it to a child layman and it’ll make sense, given they don’t use technical nomenclature.

*Layman is a better term. Children are… complicated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

The difficulty is in spinning it to sound non invasive. And of course takes a level of self corruption to even want to do that, since PPA is invasive and you have to delude yourself into thinking otherwise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

i read that as more like “nobody would opt in if it was opt-in”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

One Mozilla developer claimed that explaining PPA would be too challenging

It’s not that difficult to explain. “When you visit the website of a participating advertiser whose ads you’ve seen, do you want us to tell them that someone saw their ads and visited their site, without telling them it was you? Y/N”

But if they asked such a question almost all of the small fraction of users who bother to read the whole sentence would still see no good reason to want to participate. Coming up with one is that hard part. It requires some pretty fancy rationalizations. Firefox keeping track of which ads I’ve seen? No, thanks.

If there was an option to make sure that advertisers whose ads I’ve blocked know that they got blocked, I might go for that.

The writer apparently thinks that the previous Mozilla misstep into advertising land was the Mr. Robot thing six years ago, which seems to confirm my impression that this one is getting a bigger reaction than their other recent moves in this direction. We’ll see if the rest of the tech press picks it up. Maybe one day when the cumulative loss of users shows up more clearly in the telemetry they’ll reconsider.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Let’s not forget when they shipped a full page ad for a Disney movie into a browser update

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

If you can’t explain a difficult concept in a simple way, then you don’t truly understand it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Bah, that’s such a lame hot take.

Tonnes of things are really complicated to explain because they’re complicated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s a paraphrased quote from Richard Feynman

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

String theory. Go.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

How long is it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

So is it safe to assume that alternate builds of Firefox (Pale Moon et al) will be probably removing that “feature” ?

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Probably in your best interest to read their release notes

permalink
report
parent
reply
-25 points

I’ve tried explaining to the Firefox cult that they do a lot of tracking and telemetry by default but they just hurl insults. Time to leave the cult.

permalink
report
reply
-3 points

I get a lot of beef for Brave. Any viable alternatives that aren’t derivatives of Chromium or FF but are maintained?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

GNOME Web is mostly ok. It breaks on a few sites and doesn’t have easy extension support.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah that was exactly the conclusion I reached since asking 😅

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Firefox forks seem to be the best option. Chromium-based browsers still report to Google unless you basically break them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Webkit based browsers like safari and gnome web are your only options if you don’t want derivatives.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

tracking and telemetry by Firefox is not even comparable to that of chrome. Google knows you better than you. Firefox’s telemetry used to be solely for improving user experience, and not ads and bullshit.

Now that Firefox’s gonna show us some ads, I think I have to get away from it as a protest

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Oh wow, that needs to be off by default like yesterday. 💀

permalink
report
reply
45 points

Look, everything is going to disappoint us. Everything runs off a profit motive, and it turns out profit is immoral.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

All your heroes are dead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

“The worst thing that can happen to your people is for them to fall into the hands of a hero”

  • Dr Pardot Kines
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

New saying:

Kill all your heroes.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.8K

    Posts

  • 121K

    Comments