113 points
*

“Review Bombing” is a terrible term that attempts to discredit when consumers are not happy with the product.

permalink
report
reply
-23 points

It’s just unfortunate that this is the only avenue for players to make their disagreement felt. Game reviews should focus on the game as a whole and not one single aspect, the more these happen the less steam reviews become reliable to gauge the game’s quality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*

“One single aspect”, especially cash grubbing, completely and absolutely removes any capacity to enjoy the game from most users.

They’re not recommending that game because of that “one aspect” because that “one aspect” makes the game unplayable as far as they’re concerned.

Ignoring massive deal breaking flaws to try to do some average of individual features is a far less honest or accurate review. A single issue, if it’s big enough, can change a game from the best thing anyone’s ever made into a complete and utter pile of shit. Games are not a sum of parts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*

This isn’t massive flaws that suddenly appeared overnight, or the straw that broke the camel’s back, it’s purely because they want to get back at the developer. So yes, I think “review bombing” is accurate.

Don’t get me wrong, i dislike enshittification as much as the next guy; but I don’t think a game’s review should be about what the devs posted on twitter yesterday.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

THIS IS WHAT THEY TOOK FROM YOU

permalink
report
reply
3 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

After over 1,000 hours in that game, I left my negative review a couple years ago and quit forever. The predatory monetization eats away at the fun. Slowly at first, but building up over time. It’s just been bad decision after bad decision since the game came out. You slowly start to realize the game you’ve been playing isn’t even fun anymore and you only play for the new cosmetics for fear of missing out. Daily challenges, weekly challenges, seasons, events, limited time game modes, premium skins, loot boxes, special legendary cosmetics for those that spend the most, vaulting content for a false sense of scarcity and slow progression. And now after all this, the one thing people could get from a one time purchase (if they grind hard enough) is gone. Honestly, I’d leave another negative review if I could.

permalink
report
reply
6 points
*

I would have happily bought the game. I’m still having a ton of fun playing with friends.

But I have never, and will never, spend even a cent on it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I left when I realized people weren’t aimbotting… they’re just using a controller and my keyboard/mouse ass is being auto-aimed at from medium and short distances.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah, the fact that all the pro player switched to joypad was so sad

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

See that’s insane to me, your spent 1000!! Hours. It was obviously a good game

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s not inherently true, though. What if 99 people out of 100 who play 1000 hours are fine, but the 100th has his brain broken and is addicted to giving the owner their rent and food money? The people who escape can still see the things that the game did to their brain and not suggest anyone else go down that path.

And yes, they’re literally designed with that intention in mind, to create addicts. Escaping doesn’t mean the experience was worth it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Used to be. Hence why I don’t play it anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Is still a good game for people who had never played it. Even though you have seen and done everything and is done with the game

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

The problem is the game was developed by a (for the most part) loving studio with a vision and then EA started milking it dry.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

The term “Review bomb” has lost it’s original meaning at this point.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Every negative criticism of me must be a coordinated attack by 4chan! There’s no other option.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Well from looking at steamdb, they have an additional 1500ish negative reviews today.

But it isn’t a meaningful amount to actually catch the attention of the corpo meat suits yet.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

It takes a few days for these things to pick uo steam.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

impressive use of an idiom in a literal way appropriate to context.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Games

!games@sh.itjust.works

Create post

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc…
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc…)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

Community stats

  • 6.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.8K

    Posts

  • 13K

    Comments

Community moderators