Calling the free online collaborative encyclopedia “Wokepedia,” Musk said it should “restore balance” to its “editing authority.”

Visit us @ !fediverse_vs_disinfo@lemmy.dbzer0.com for all the latest news on the topics of astroturfing, propaganda and disinformation.

110 points

You know what I’m gonna donate even harder now

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Good idea, just donated a tenner

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

Prove it

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Username checks out!

permalink
report
parent
reply
83 points

i look forward to reading the near-future headline “wikipedia sees surge in donations”

permalink
report
reply
19 points

I already donated for the first tine recently. I guess I could smell the impending winds. But this overt mandate may be what pushes me past one time into regular scheduled donations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I did it. $5.65/mo.

Do I get $5.65/mo out of wikipedia? I don’t having a fucking clue how to value the knowledge I get out of it, so I’ll say yes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Try the easiest way. Its about 40 minutes of paid work assuming US minimum wage, 15 min if you’re a kiwi.

Id take that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
65 points

Grandson of Nazis, son of apartheid mine owners, revealing his true colors.

permalink
report
reply

Wikepedia is good

But archive.org is in more dire need of resources

English Wikipedia = 100GB (without the videos)

archive.org has like TERABYTES with some reports of it being in PETABYTES, storage is costly, also they need to backup the archive in case of drive failures

also they need bandwidth to let people access the stuff there

also they just gotten hacked a few months ago, security could cost money

And constantly facing lawsuit from big corporation, lawsuits definitely cost a lot of money

I feel like they need it more

What I’m saying is: if you have $55 to give, give $5 to wikipedia, $50 to archive.org

permalink
report
reply
-6 points

I’m pretty sure Wikipedia serves WAY WAY more content than archive.org

Space on disk isn’t everything

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

All of Wikipedia is on the Internet archive. Including history of articles and images

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

And how many people do you think uses either on a daily basis

Wikipedia is the 7# most visited website in the world

Archive.org is like #200

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

You never use the wayback machine?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Sure, but Wikipedia is used a whole lot more.

Storage is very cheap, and should not be used as a metric for how much money an organization needs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Anyone can edit Wikipedia but archive.org is a snapshot of history

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

I try to donate a few bucks every year to Wikipedia … my thinking is that if every person that uses Wikipedia just donated a dollar, they would have more than enough to fund their organization.

But after reading these stupid headlines … I made a $50 donation for the first time. I use the site just about every day for reference … I should be paying for it and I’m happy to.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

It’s kind of the best way to come about realizing something’s value and the need to support it. Good on you!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I usually do, again only a few bucks.

This absolute wealth of knowledge on virtually everything for an optional donation of a few $ a year - abso-fucking-lutely.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This is going to be an unpopular opinion here but based on the available info Wikipedia has enough to keep running for many years without issue.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Fediverse vs Disinformation

!fediverse_vs_disinfo@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Create post

Pointing out, debunking, and spreading awareness about state- and company-sponsored astroturfing on Lemmy and elsewhere. This includes social media manipulation, propaganda, and disinformation campaigns, among others.

Propaganda and disinformation are a big problem on the internet, and the Fediverse is no exception.

What’s the difference between misinformation and disinformation? The inadvertent spread of false information is misinformation. Disinformation is the intentional spread of falsehoods.

By equipping yourself with knowledge of current disinformation campaigns by state actors, corporations and their cheerleaders, you will be better able to identify, report and (hopefully) remove content matching known disinformation campaigns.


Community rules

Same as instance rules, plus:

  1. No disinformation
  2. Posts must be relevant to the topic of astroturfing, propaganda and/or disinformation

Related websites


Matrix chat links

Community stats

  • 1.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 450

    Posts

  • 1.2K

    Comments