0 points

Can’t wait for decimal time with 100,000 seconds/day /s

permalink
report
reply
0 points

I actually quite like this idea. Or we could start using number base 12 instead of 10 everywhere else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

This would outdate centuries of equipment and scientific publications in the metric system.

A better idea is the International Fixed Calendar:

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

It seems the leap day should just be next to the New Year’s Day, not randomly in the middle of the year. Most people then get an extra long weekend (almost) every 4 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I always get a semi when this calendar is mentioned, I love it so much! Maybe someday, this is what we’ll all be using.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Uh, hell no. There should be ten months a year, ten days in a month, and ten hours in a day, ten minutes in an hour… and we should all use artificial lighting with scheduled blackout blinds to make the daylight hours line up. Putting everyone in the world on the one true timezone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

If we’re doing that, we should fix the month names. We start off really strong with January, named after Janus, Roman god of doorways, transitions and new beginnings. Banger name for a month honestly. Things remain pretty solid up until June, then we completely drop the ball in the second half of the year. Honoring two egotistical tyrants, then we just give up and number the rest of the months, and incorrectly at that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I like the spirit, but it needs tweaking. Sept, Oct, Nov, and Dec need to go back to being 7, 8, 9, & 10, respectively. Also, make the leap day at the end of the final month to keep all the weeks starting on the same day of the week.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

It’ll likely happen once we move to living mostly in space (if we survive that long ofc)

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

With a full switch to metric, hopefully. We’ve lost a Mars probe to unit confusion already.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Not everything needs to be base 10.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Unfortunately, there is no easy way to decimalise time for human use. If you make it useful for humans, it doesn’t sync well to a day. If you make it sync to a day, the resulting units are awkward for the human mind.

Amusingly, for computers, time is decimalised! UTC is a fully metric time. It’s just simpler to constantly remap to and from UTC to a user’s time, than to train the user to use UTC.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

For computers, Unix time is in binary. But yes.

However, humans can get used to longer/shorter seconds, minutes and hours. Arguing the opposite is like saying the meter would never work because it doesn’t have a human body relation like feet. The problem is the sheer amount of documents, equipment and SI using the 24/60/60 system, and the indivisibility of 365.24.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Decimal time exists, thanks to the French Revolution.

There are 100 decimal seconds in a decimal minute, 100 minutes in a decimal hour, and 10 hours in a decimal day. Each second is slightly shorter than a SI second.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I know and nobody uses it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Is this like when they made the kilogram some function of the speed of light instead of the weight of a metal ball in a French museum?

permalink
report
reply
0 points

They linked the kilogram to the gravitational force.

It’s part of an effort to clarify how we define things. We’re now trying to link our recorded units to the basic forces they are related to. So now, the kilogram is defined by the gravitational force, the meter by how fast light travels, etc etc

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

The kilogram is defined as the mass equivalent of a photon of a specific energy via the Planck constant h thus linking the speed of light and the frequency of the hyperfine level of caesium-133. The relative uncertainty of the measured value of the gravitational constant G is 10^-5 which would lead to a definition of the kilogram that has a worse relative uncertainty than using the former definition defined via an international prototype. The Wikipedka article is more detailed than this short summary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

At first I was like: The second what?

permalink
report
reply
0 points

That’s the problem when your language doesn’t have capitalization for nouns

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

The most relevant paragraph:

Now, using a new way of linking the clocks with ultra-fast lasers, researchers have shown that different kinds of optical atomic clocks can be placed a few kilometres apart and still agree within 1 part in 10¹⁸. This is just as good as previous measurements with pairs of identical clocks a few hundred metres apart, but about a hundred times more precise than achieved before with different clocks or large distances.

permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.9K

    Posts

  • 127K

    Comments