5 points

I like Wikipedia but I’m still not going to donate. They’ve got many millions and a bunch of millionaires on the board. They don’t need my money!

permalink
report
reply
4 points

These millionaires may or may not do anything for Wikipedia.

They don’t make profit, there is no risk of “over donating”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

The risk is that they vote for higher salaries for themselves! They already earn way more than most people!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They are board members of a non profit that is performing splendidly. If the options are to either pay them more or lose them to the private sector I say jjst pay them more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

These people would earn orders of magnitude more in the for profit industry.

I would really like to retain them given that they are clearly doing a pretty amazing job

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
17 points

Honestly doesn’t seem like a big deal to me. The concept behind Wikipedia is that it is a self correcting community. There was never a chance no one contributing would have ulterior motives, but that doesn’t mean it has a lasting or large impact.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*

The methods that Wikipedia uses to determine appropriate sources and correcting “bad edits” is highly susceptible to status quo bias from it’s home country. This means that Wikipedia has a very heavy bias towards history from a US perspective. In most situations, it doesn’t really matter. However if you’re trying to look into political research (or anything else controversial) it’s a very poor tool. Governments love this setup, because this knowledge manipulation seems innocuous until it isn’t.

Edit: since it seems folks are already a couple mugs of eggnog deep, I’d like to clarify my point. There are legitimate and worthwhile criticisms of Wikipedia, but none worthy of mass defunding. We shouldn’t let some fascist like Musk control the conversation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Agree, but cut donation won’t resolve such problems, and whatever #SpaceKaren want to happen to the Wikipedia would benefit the US even more in detriment of all the world.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

The cia and fbi don’t have a lasting or large impact…? Are you high?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Are you high? I was obviously saying if someone edits out misinformation, its impact has been abated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Relevance to the conversation at hand?

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

He looks like he starts all his announcements with an unironic “fellow humans”.

Seriously, is he some kind of meat puppet controlled by incel aliens?

permalink
report
reply
30 points

Runs platform based on lies and hates platform based on truth. Check notes yeah that about sums it up.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Did they start banning corporate and government mass editors?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Can we have some context for that picture?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
5 points

Ah, thanks. I wasn’t sure which rich person I was supposed to recognize from this.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Political Weirdos

!political_weirdos@lemmy.world

Create post

A community dedicated to the weirdest people involved in politics.

  • Focus on weird behaviors and beliefs
  • Follow Iemmy.world TOS
  • Don’t be a jerk

Community stats

  • 2.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 177

    Posts

  • 2.5K

    Comments

Community moderators