Advance opens door for secure quantum applications without specialized infrastructure

-2 points

If I understand it right, this could enable real time connectivity between client and server.

permalink
report
reply
29 points
*

Nope, quantum entanglement canā€™t enable FTL communication. ā€œReal timeā€ still involves lightspeed lag.

What it does is allows random bits of information to be transmitted in an entangled state. You send an entangled pair of photons, and find out afterwards who got a 1 or a 0 when the photons are observed at either end. They call it ā€˜quantum teleportationā€™ because both ends know what the other got, and the information about who got what canā€™t be intercepted without disrupting the enganglement.

Once they can figure out how to preserve that uncertainty through repeaters, switches, and routers, then we can have a quantum internet that uses encryption based on shared quantum random numbers. Itā€™s likely to be necessary soon since quantum computers might only be a few years from breaking current common encryption techniques.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Yup, definitely. Took the words right out of my mouth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Thank you for your explanation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points
*

The article starts by doing the ā€œquantumā€ thing that really irks me, where they use confusing terminology to make it sound like ā€œFTL communicationā€ without actually saying it. This is garbage that doesnā€™t actually matter to the article.

Basically, they found a way to send quantum entangled photons (which exist in a very delicate unobserved state) through existing fiber optic infrastructure without interfering with the standard internet information already travelling through the fiber. A lot of the difficulty with this is due to signal noise that needs to be filtered out. This will be useful communicating quantum measurements over long distances.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

The article starts by doing the ā€œquantumā€ thing that really irks me

Basically, they found a way to send quantum entangled photons

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It should be a legal requirement to link the actual research paper at the top of science articles

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

2nd paragraph wasnā€™t good enough, huh?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

ā€œOnly limited by the speed of lightā€¦ā€

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

They then go on to describe what sounds like

  • transmitting a single specific photon through ā€˜the internetā€™, implying start-to-finish with routing (not possible without special infrastructure)

  • Use that photon to then send information instantly by manipulating its entangled sibling (also not possible)

So yeah this article is a crock of shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

The article did not describe either of those things that way. Cynicism is overriding reading comprehension.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

not sure why I read this

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Why not?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Are you not sure because you donā€™t understand the subject matter or donā€™t care about it? The first is easy to fix it youā€™d like. The second would have me just as curious as you are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

the first, I understood nothing but still read it entirely hoping to make some sense of it šŸ˜…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

This article is building off of the readers assumed knowledge of quantum entanglement. If you donā€™t have that, they youā€™d absolutely be lost.

Hereā€™s a simple explanation of quantum entanglement:

Imagine you have four balls of playdoh and a coin. You flip the coin and let in land on the floor. Without looking at which side is up, you smash one of the balls of playdoh over the coin. You gently peal up the playdoh off the coin but are careful to not look at the face of the coin or the impression it left in the playdoh. You take another ball of playdoh and flatten it between your hands. You very gently lay the flattened playdoh over top of the coin-impression playdoh. You pinch just all the edges together. So now you a single piece of playdoh with the coin impression sealed inside. You do the steps of created a second piece of playdoh from the same coin with the same side up (again without looking at it). Lastly, you close your eyes and pick up the coin and put it back in your pocket, again without looking at it. So now you have TWO of these pieces of playdoh with the coin impression sealed inside and you donā€™t know which coin impression (heads or tails) is in there, but you know its the same one in both. Instead of wrapping the playdoh in plastic so they donā€™t dry out, you leave them out for a week and they become hard and crusty as playdoh does.

These two pieces of playdoh are essentially what quantum entangled photons are. They contain information (a coin impression of either heads or tails, but not both), both have the SAME information (both will be heads or both will be tails), and there is no way to know if its heads or tails without tearing open the playdoh to look.

Hereā€™s the expanded idea for using quantum entanglement for encryption:

Alice and Bob want to meet each other in secret a week from now. The problem is Bobā€™s ex girlfriend, Mallory. Sheā€™s has been stalking Bob to chase off any potential future girlfriends. To keep Mallory from finding out where they are meeting, you meet both Alice and Bob separately and give them one of the playdoh pieces you created in the first step. They agree that if its ā€œheadsā€ found inside theyā€™ll meet at the restaurant. If its ā€œtailsā€ found inside theyā€™ll meet at the park. If they learn Mallory knows where theyā€™re meeting, theyā€™ll not meet at all. One week later, Alice and Bob each open their playdoh and even though it crumbles, they can both see that the ā€œtailsā€ impression was inside the playdoh. They know each other is going to the park. They successfully meet at the park and Mallory learns nothing of the meeting or who Alice is.

A week later Alice and Bob want to meet again. They take a new pair of playdoh pieces with a new coin impression inside you made for them. This time however, Mallory overheard Bob talking to his friend about this system and what heads and tails mean. Mallory gets into Bobs apartment when heā€™s out and finds the playdoh. She breaks open the playdoh and sees the ā€œheadsā€ impression and knows it means that the meeting will be at the restaurant. Mallory tries to put the playdoh back together, but its dried and crumbly, so its clear its been opened when she leaves. Bob returns to this apartment and finds the playdoh broken open, also sees the ā€œheadsā€ impression, but knows that someone else knows it too. At the meeting time Alice shows up at the restaurant, as does Mallory looking for Bob and whoever he is trying to meet. Bob doesnā€™t show. Mallory never learns who Alice is because Bob wasnā€™t there to meet and identify her there. Alice knows that Mallory is there somewhere because Bob didnā€™t show and quietly leaves on her own.

So hereā€™s where the article is coming in for using regular internet fiber optics:

Alice and Bob want to meet a third time, and come to you for more playdoh impressions. Instead of each of them coming to your home to pick them up at separate times. You take each piece of playdoh (with the coin impression inside), and put them in cardboard boxes, and drop them in the mail. Alice gets her box and opens it up and finds the playdoh intact. Bob does the same. All of you thought that the playdoh was too fragile to share the same mail system, but the playdoh survived intact with its secret still safe inside!

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

#Hey Kids! Guess which word is getting shoehorned into EVERY technology discussion in 2025 until it becomes meaningless?

permalink
report
reply
16 points
*

Only limited by the speed of light,

What exactly do you think the normal ip data is limited by on the same optical cable?

I thought we were talking about quantum entaglement and spooky action at a distance, which is famously not limited by the speed of light?

Am I missing something obvious?

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Yes, quantum entanglement occurs without the speed of light, but we famously cannot interpret information from it faster than the speed of light - it isnā€™t FTL communication.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

famous potatoes

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.7K

    Posts

  • 153K

    Comments