Title. I’ve heard some say it is because the storyline is incoherent compared to the prior two movies.

1 point

I’m amazed that this C/ exists.

But, no. It was perfect at the time. It built on that world in a very interesting way, despite the flaws. Incoherent would be grossly inaccurate. Could it use better editing? Absolutely. But the story is there, you can follow it without difficulty.

I loved it as much or more than the first movie tbh, flaws and all.

Plus, c’mon, Tina Turner? How can you hate that?

permalink
report
reply
3 points

I’m amazed that this C/ exists.

Currently fixating on MM and felt I needed to make a sub. Especially considering lots of people have already watched Furiosa and likely have opinions on it (psst, I made a post about that).

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Nothing wrong with that :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Have you ever considered going through the rest of George Miller’s filmography?

I did it recently (following along with a podcast that was doing the same). It’s a weird and fascinating journey haha.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

The first half is great. The second half is pretty rough tho.

¯\(ツ)

Doctor Miller is a mystery

permalink
report
reply

Everything Mad Max

!madmax@midwest.social

Create post

Everything Mad Max – novels, films, comics, head-canons, essays and video essays. Including “Furiosa.”

Community stats

  • 33

    Monthly active users

  • 12

    Posts

  • 29

    Comments

Community moderators