0 points

The title here is a little misleading. A signal that repeated once per hour, as in 60 minutes, would be pretty astounding, and might be a good way for a civilization with enough information about us to say ‘hi’ in a way we’d recognize. It would certainly be very strange to see a natural phenomenon ticking away the hours at a precise rate.

53.8 minutes, on the other hand, is a bit less attention grabbing.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

I’d argue that a more precise timing like 53.8 minutes is more attention grabbing. It shows finer grained control of technology; a “look here! we can do this too!” sort of demonstration.

If we are the “more advanced” neighbor; then I could see that being done.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Such a cycle is a cycle like any other. It’s not “more precise” when it’s shorter.

We attribute the 53.8 according to our scale.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Space

!space@beehaw.org

Create post

News and findings about our cosmos.


Subcommunity of Science


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 90

    Monthly active users

  • 102

    Posts

  • 103

    Comments