69 points

We’re truly in a dystopian future when big tech nerds are doing mafia hits. Reminds me of that guy in Better Call Saul that hired Mike as a bodyguard.

permalink
report
reply
64 points

Police say it appears to be a suicide. Probably true, honestly, but that doesn’t mean he wasn’t driven to it.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

That’s even worse!

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

I wouldn’t believe the cops without some evidence either way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Police say it appears to be a suicide.

Let me guess: it was less than 30 stabs that they found in his back?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

“He blew the whistle on a multibillion dollar company - obviously he knew they’d kill him! Suicide.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

What whistle did he blow?

permalink
report
reply
27 points

I didn’t even read the article. I just barely skimmed it and guess what I found within 2 seconds.

“Balaji’s death comes three months after he publicly accused OpenAI of violating U.S. copyright law while developing ChatGPT, a generative artificial intelligence program that has become a moneymaking sensation used by hundreds of millions of people across the world.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It was more of an opinion piece. They were already being sued and he didn’t bring any new info forward from what I understand.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

He had hard proof chat gpt used copyright work to train. Opening them up to lawsuits of said copyright holders and basically collapsing the whole company.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You don’t even need “Hard” proof. The mere fact that ChatGPT “knows” about certain things indicate that it ingested certain copyrighted works. There are countless examples. Can it quote a book you like? Does it know the plot details? There is no other way for it to get certain information about such things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The issue is proving that it ingested the original copyrighted work, and not some hypothetical public copyleft essay.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Facts aren’t protected by copyright. Regurgitating facts about a thing is in no way illegal, even if done by ai and done by ingested copyrighted material. I can legally make a website dedicated to stating only facts about Disney products (all other things the same) when prompted by questions of my users.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I think you’re missing the point. We are talking about whether it is fair use under the law for an AI model to even ingest copyrighted works and for those works to be used as a basis to generate the model’s output without the permission of the copyright holder of those works. This is an unsettled legal question that is being litigated right now.

Also, in some cases, the models do produce verbatim quotes of original works. So, it’s not even like we’re just arguing about whether the AI model stated some “facts.” We are also saying, hey can an AI model verbatim reproduce an actual copyrighted work? It’s settled law that humans cannot do that except in limited circumstances.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

His AI GF must’ve convinced him to shoot himself in the back of the head with a shotgun twice.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Twice is better. Reliable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

If Zombieland taught us anything, it’s the double-tap.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

RIP. Hope that his whistleblowing doesn’t end up falling on deaf ears

permalink
report
reply
4 points

There are 11 others involved in the case.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.7K

    Posts

  • 153K

    Comments