26 points

The man probably went insane after psychedelic use, and I have never noticed @BasedBeffJezos to advocate for fixing the system by shooting individual executives. It’s a great shot at drawing a plausible-sounding connection; but I think it’s not valid criticism.

wait I’m confused, to be a more effective TESCREAL am I not supposed to be microdosing psychedelics every day? you’re sending mixed signals here, yud (also lol @ the pure Ronald Reagan energy of going “yep obviously drugs just make you murderously insane” based on nothing but vibes and the need to find a scapegoat that isn’t the consequences of your own ideology)

permalink
report
reply
12 points

also lol @ the pure Ronald Reagan energy of going “yep obviously drugs just make you murderously insane”

always think of this (which is just multiple kinds of amazing in the current day; that it keeps getting used as a sample in dance tracks is just even better)

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

HQ sez the grift is pivoting back to puritanical virtue ethics, we need to have cleansing struggle memes ready by next week so we can hit it hard over the holidays. Did you not get the memo?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

The man probably went insane after psychedelic use

So parts of his manifesto (which was short) was published, and it was pain that radicalized him, ah well a superpredictor like Yud can’t be right all the times. If only he had the image of a blade of grass that could have been a hint, sadly we did not.

Spoiler for the image link.

The image is a scan of a persons back with various medical rods in the back, which was part of the (ALLEGED) shooters twitter image before it got deleted. The blade of grass thing is a reference to an infamous story of Yud about how AGI could figure out another universes physics just by looking at a video frame of a blade of grass bending in the wind.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

LOL I GUESS E/ACC MEANS EXECUTIVE ACCOUNTABILITY NOW RITE GUISE??? :D

I would love to see more executives face accountability for their fuckery, ACTUALLY!

permalink
report
reply
13 points

i’m sure we can get there with reasoned discussion and voting harder

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You’re being sarcastic right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

No sarcasm, is banned on this sub for being counter revolutionary and stopping good rational debate. Just say no to sarcasm!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

mod note: it’s time for less enthusiasm

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’m farting harder, and it must be praxis if it feels this good. Can anybody help me get set up on ActBlue?

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

This Horrifying Neoreactionary Techfash’s Redemption Arc Will Warm Your Heart

permalink
report
reply
24 points

On the other hand, bombing foreign data centers, likely located in densely populated urban areas, would be justified and morally upstanding if it seems like they might be incarnating the imaginary computer god! I’m glad we have such a nuanced thinker guiding our modern morality.

permalink
report
reply
38 points

greatest point against him being a rationalist is the 262 word manifesto, it would be 20,000 words with sections numbered I. II. III. and possibly diagrams

permalink
report
reply
6 points

@dgerard “The best teachers are the best communicators: clear, succinct, simple language”

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Someone tell Peterson, he’s got a lot of editing to do for his diatribes on cleaning your room and kissing boots.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Looks at username

A chaos dragon, Peterson warned us against your type! All we need now is a dream of a grandmother.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

A nice exponential curve depicting the infinite future lives saved by whacking a ceo

permalink
report
parent
reply

SneerClub

!sneerclub@awful.systems

Create post

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

[Especially don’t debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

Community stats

  • 364

    Monthly active users

  • 161

    Posts

  • 2.5K

    Comments