Google said that such negative reviews, unrelated to the actual business, “violates” its policies, and hence have been removed.

116 points

I for one believe that the question of whether a food service establishment has rats is very relevant to the business.

The character of the staff and clientele as well as the financial state of the staff as a direct result of how stingy their employer is can also be very relevant. Do you want to eat somewhere if the people preparing your food there will sell their morals and decency? Kinda seems likely that I could pay somebody there $100 to put their pubes into your quarter pounder.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

You aren’t a CEO though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

And? CEOs seem to be welcome there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

We can tell by the still being alive part.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Maybe the person only heard of the murder, saw some pictures, and didn’t know about all the “justice warriors” foaming at the mouth. I know plenty of people who hardly use the Internet and certainly don’t go on any social media platforms, even Facebook. We can’t expect every single person to know all the details.

permalink
report
parent
reply
217 points

Users left reviews for at least three McDonald’s locations in or around Altoona, Pennsylvania, with dozens of people leaving one star ratings and complaining about “rats.” Others more explicitly called out “snitches.”

“This location has rats in the kitchen that will make you sick and your insurance isn’t going to cover it,” one reviewer wrote.

Based reviewers

permalink
report
reply
83 points

All this convenience in tech. We never stopped to ask ourselves what we were giving up. Add protest to the list of sacrifices to the altar of affluence.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Don’t get me wrong, I also hate Monopolies, but a company exercising their rights on their own platform? Fine by me. Just don’t use their platform.

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points

That’s a reasonable stance to take when said company is just one competing in a marketplace. But when they are a monopoly operating a quasi-utility that should be public its not good enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s interacting in our country, meaning we can do more than only “don’t use it”. When the platform is so massive, has little competition, or most other platforms do the same thing in question… maybe we should do more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

How is spreading lies about a company on a review platform a “protest”?

Surely if there was something to protest about, it would be about things that company had actually done, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I was enthusiastic over tech then and I did stop, I did also tell these things to my classmates and friends, and was treated as some mix of nerd and luddite simultaneously, if you can believe that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The Luddite - An anticapitalist Tech blog helped me understand why these seemingly contradictory worldviews don’t necessarily have to be–its a matter of what and for whom technology has been put to use.

As an example, Louis Pasteur gave away his patent for the good of medicine. It sounds almost impossible to believe against the modern backdrop of pharmaceutical companies that don’t even want to develop cures, they want “subscription” customers.

People have been trained now that since no one watches out for them they have to take their pound of flesh however it can be gotten–this is what stands out to people when they talk about societal decay, selfishness and anomie but it can be difficult to put ones finger on without understanding the workings of the machine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

For me it seems that in our childhood and dreams we can fit bigger things in our mind.

Such as that sometimes no one watches out for you and sometimes someone does, and there’s no bigger secret. It’s just this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

If the only form of protest we have is virtual and based on stars and upvotes, then we are doing it very, very wrong

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I mean, they’re correct.

But fuck McDonald’s.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Why blame a business for the actions of one person?

permalink
report
reply
-3 points
*

Because they are glorified the guy who did the crime and blaming that McDonald’s for snitching and getting him caught.

America is wild, next time you see a wanted person, don’t call the police…

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.7K

    Posts

  • 153K

    Comments