-49 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
47 points

Look what up? What exactly do you want me to write in my search engine? I copied and pasted your entire first two sentences and got no results.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

I vaguely recall this and it did happen, I wish I could link a source.

It’s kind of out of context though. You can support having a book available with profane language and suggest that people not use such language at a school board meeting at the same time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Ah, my old enemy,

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

What in the world are you talking about?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

“thatll teach them damn librals”

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Turns out it’s possible to have books in schools that contain language that is inappropriate for a classroom. Any decent teacher would still allow you to discuss the book, but that doesn’t mean said language is ok outside of that context, and children are smart enough to make that difference if we allow and teach them to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I could do the same thing with the book The Color Purple. That doesn’t mean we should ban The Color Purple

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I read huckleberry Finn in high school, but that was one we weren’t allowed to read out loud

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Oh yum that sounds like a cherry picked list of lascivious moments from great literature taken out of context and lined up against the wall together until they look like a pornographic paradise. Surely this is how we should evaluate material!

Romeo and Juliet is kiddie porn - a veritable manual for pedo groomers!!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
100 points

Growing up I was under the impression that no one could ban books in the US. Fahrenheit 451 was a book we read and studied in sixth grade. I think that’s around 12 years old-ish. That’s when we also started learning the constitution and basics of law.

It blows my mind we’re going through this nonsense right now

permalink
report
reply
3 points

You’re right of course, but your 6th grade teacher should have told you that the subject of the book could happen again. Freedom, eternal vigilance, and so on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

I mean, it was sixth grade. They could have said that. I didn’t keep the transcripts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You don’t have the study material?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

You don’t have a pornographic memory?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

The second I heard Trump got elected, I gave standard ebooks $10 and grabbed their entire library, and did a “shopping spree” on zlibrary.

how do you…

Grab fiction and nonfiction from their collections page. That covers every book.

History repeats itself. Left, right, left, right. One foot after the other. It’ll be here soon. Who knows, you might live to see a bread line four blocks long by age 70.

Perk up!

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Might also want to check out https://gutenberg.org, it’s got about 70x the books that standard ebooks has, even if its not as well refurbished.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I have a dirty pull of their site from a torrent that I need to clean up. My issue is cross-referencing it with standard to see what I have and don’t. I might get Calibre to handle it if it happens to identify them as the same book, I’ll just import Gutenberg afterwards and skip the existing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

Growing up I didn’t think abortion was controversial, only very religious conservative people standing outside abortion clinics find it controversial. Wasn’t until we overturned roe v wade when I realized there are way more people who disagree with abortion than I initially thought.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

interesting perspective. i grew up in a super conservative circle and i was under the impression that most people found it morally wrong. in reality, the vast majority of Americans support access to abortion in some way, regardless if they would personally have one themselves

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

I remember learning through multiple personal experiences some time during highschool that some adults were vastly less intelligent and wise than some of my fellow 16 yr olds, it was shocking to me. Honestly I think some people hit puberty and just began coasting, ego and entitlement outweighed curiosity, and they began to live with the belief that society’s collection of history, science, and reasoning, was worth less than their own personal opinion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Oh, absolutely. Peaking in highschool is a very real thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

its a shame those same people are also 90% of the management field.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

I’m glad they’re taking steps to oppose fuckery. I’m disgusted that these steps have become necessary (or at least prudent).

permalink
report
reply
67 points
*

Them banning the bans makes me chuckle.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Wi nøt trei a høliday in Sweden thi yer?

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Conservatives should have banned ban-bans first if they wanted to get their way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Isn’t that in Project 2025 somewhere?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Yes but project 2025 has been banned so we are all good there

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Then Democrats hit 'em with the ban ban ban ban.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

I recommend reading the US constitution. Basically this is what the Bill of Rights is.

Also many States added bans on banning of abortions to their Constitutions for the same reason.

We need a lot more of these, like bans on bans of encrypted apps without backdoors. Bans on bans of “vagrancy” and other laws made to target black people. Bans on book bans in prison.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The land of freedom has reached the point that we must ban banning things rather than framing it as guaranteeing the right to d9 a thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m interested how this works, technically. I’m against banning books. I’m also against elementary school kids picking up Naked Lunch in the school library and leaving through it. I presume no librarian would elect to have that book anyway, so it will never be tested whether it can be barred somehow. There are also probably soft mechanisms that get used like “it’s in the library and you can check it out with a parental permission form.” Anyway how to handle obscene material has been a question since the beginning of time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

The school would still have to be the one buying the books so they just won’t buy any book they deem inappropriate. I’m sure this is mainly just to stop zealots from banning everything related to evolution. Also, I haven’t read Naked Lunch but from what I know of it, I doubt it has anything kids can’t get on the Internet nowadays.

From the article:

The bill permits restriction in the case of “developmentally inappropriate material” for certain age groups. The measure also requires local school boards and the governing bodies of public libraries to set up policies for book curation and the removal of library materials, including a way to address concerns over certain items.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Doesn’t know the book: check Casually dismisses the entire topic of moderating children’s content intake: check

It’s pretty clear you don’t know what you’re talking about on any level here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The bill permits restriction in the case of “developmentally inappropriate material” for certain age groups. The measure also requires local school boards and the governing bodies of public libraries to set up policies for book curation and the removal of library materials, including a way to address concerns over certain items.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Leaving a gap open for “developmentally inappropriate” makes sense in the face of it, but when Evangelicals try to ban any book that has a depiction of a gay character, this is the rationale they use: that kids should not be subjected to sexual material. I’m not saying their argument holds water, just that the gap left open by this prohibition is the exact favorite entry point of book ban abusers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The bill permits restriction in the case of “developmentally inappropriate material” for certain age groups. The measure also requires local school boards and the governing bodies of public libraries to set up policies for book curation and the removal of library materials, including a way to address concerns over certain items.

I was thinking that probably not all books are suited to a school library lol

permalink
report
reply
2 points
*

Tbf most of the ones “banned” are banned because of language (I found as many of the PDFs as I could one time and searched the documents for “fuck,” which many of them contained, or other words that would be banned in schools), or in one case a graphic novel with a panel depicting a blowjob, and I have been corrected before that it “wasn’t technically a blowjob it was ‘strap on play,’” but, c’mon strap on play is banned in schools too whether it’s between straights or gays. Sure it’s educational, but it’s not the same as an anti racist book that has the N-word in a historical context (TKAM) or something. Most of those are still going to be banned due to that, the rape scenes in a few, “fuck,” “cocksucker,” etc.

This seems more like a feel good measure just to say “See we fixed it! All those same books are still banned, but now we’re claiming the actual reasons instead of homophobia.” I’d be interested to see an itemized breakdown of the ISBNs before/after.

For reference, here’s a PDF to Gender Queer on Archive, one of the most popularized, at the top of every “they banned these books” list:

https://archive.org/details/gender-queer-a-memoir-by-maia-kobabe-z-lib.org/page/62/mode/1up

A) Share it with anyone who needs it! I don’t believe in limiting the free flow of information online or at the public libraries (bans there are eggregious flat out), but

B) Check out page 62 and page 168, this would never fly in my schools whether it was straight or gay, let’s be real.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Uplifting News

!upliftingnews@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today’s news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity’s capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else’s big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

Community stats

  • 3.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 336

    Posts

  • 3.4K

    Comments