7 points

Is this “global news”?

permalink
report
reply
2 points

America is on the globe, last time I checked

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

https://penntoday.upenn.edu/news/presidential-pardons-explained

Tried to educate myself on what the pardon consists of (why?)…and found that there is no real separation between the executive branch and the judicial branch, because prosecution is up to the executive branch and the president can pardon whomever e.g.

For instance, George Washington pardoned participants in the Whisky Rebellion, in part because they enjoyed considerable popular support.

Meaning, you are above the law if you are popular enough: i.e. president, their friend, their agent or even just his rioter. Good thing the opposition to trump is popular too, right?

permalink
report
reply
15 points

The new Presidency will absolutely spin and use this event.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

I think he was going to do that regardless and come up with a bullshit excuse. Now he doesn’t need a bullshit excuse and he’s still going to do it. Big deal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I mean, it’ll make it harder / less likely for people to oppose things. Unless I’m still way too naive even after this last term. I’m still way too naive even after this last term aren’t I!?:-(

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

On a more personal level, I think any parent would’ve given that pardon if they felt their child was targeted for their political career. I think he would’ve always regretted not putting his pride aside. On a political level, holy shit. Brace yourselves, folks, and take lots of notes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Ya, next thing you know they’ll pardon Charles Kushner and make him ambasssador.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

No need to spin. I think we can all agree that pardoning Hunter after saying for years that he wouldn’t is bad.

I don’t blame him because…fuck it, the system’s broken anyway…but I’m not gonna pretend like I support it

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

They will spin it regardless:-P.

Not everyone seems to be agreeing that this is bad.

Yes the system is broken but the optics here look REALLY bad.

I liken it to what happened to the post office: first they shoot it in the leg, then blame it for being slow, then move to kill it off, citing how poor its performance is and thus deserving of blame and yeah sure “that” is why it must be killed off.

Now they have that much more support to kill off the DOJ - b/c despite how the President can do whatever he wants, now the previous President also did whatever he wants too (not really but again, optics, especially to those who will refuse to dig deeper into learning about something, even prior to showing up with a gun to help “defend democracy”).

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The way it looks looks bad?

Your country is fucked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

To do the things they would have done anyway. This is what we chose for ourselves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Yes but now it will be that much more difficult to fight against it - assuming anyone even tries.

Hunter himself pleaded guilty, and this pardon is prior to sentencing (there are reasons for such obviously), and the justification is not that he is innocent, but that people who commit this crime usually are punished in a civil rather than criminal manner. Plus Biden seemed to be firm that he would never do this, until then he changed his mind and did - which on top of “DOJ bad” adds a measure of “President can do however he pleases”. Especially for people who aren’t paying attention, these are powerful symbols.

Conservatives were going to try, and who are we kidding almost certainly will have succeeded (definitely eventually anyway, even if heavy pushback might have lengthened the timetable more than they would have preferred), but their chances of succeeding right away are now higher than they were last week.

I wonder what the alternative would have been - 16 months in jail for the crimes he committed (that was only for one of the two though), vs. what now that will shake the foundation of our nation?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s clear from Trump’s first term that he is not constrained by “optics” or “precedent” at all. He already pardoned a large number of his allies for personal gain. He was always going to abuse the system regardless.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Two wrongs don’t make a right.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I get downvoted for saying both parties are as bad as eachother. Whats the justification for this lol?

permalink
report
reply
2 points

One’s a literal inssurectionist who pardoned all of his criminal cronies, who’s only defense against his attempts to steal the election was “I need criminal immunity”.

Biden pardons his own son who absolutely wouldn’t have been targeted were he not a Biden. Trump pardoned Charles Kushner, Jared’s father.

They are absolutely unequivocal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

When one side plays by the rules and the other side doesn’t, then the side playing by the rules will always lose. That’s a lesson the Democrats are just learning.

What’s important to note is who is willing to break the rules first. That’s your bad guy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

People tend to downvite things they think are stupid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

because there is no evidence for that statement.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

That’s like saying Hitler and Gandhi are the same because they both breath air.

Some people think you are stupid because it seems you can’t grasp that two things aren’t the same just because they share one attribute.

Other people think you are actively lying, using an easy to see trough rhetoric to normalize the gross shit reps do.

Pardoning your son isn’t the same as letting people die because you think their body belongs to you. They are not equally bad. One is clearly worse.

And that is why you get down voted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points
*

You probably get downvoted for saying that because it’s false as fuck. And besides being false, it’s the laziest shit ever.

permalink
report
parent
reply

The dems: get mad at trump for pardoning people they dony like

Biden: pardons his own son.

The dems: when we do it its ok.

Clearly as bad as eachother wake up they want u to get distracted by this while they carefully tie the noise around ur neck.

Just cos its lazy doesnt mean it aint true

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s almost like there’s more to a political party than their pardons…

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Trump’s pardons wouldn’t make his top 150 crimes. I barely saw any reaction to those. so off the bat you seem entirely full of shit and looking for some lame excuse to pretend the parties are the same. you haven’t paid any attention whatsoever and that’s why you’ve a shitty lazy false argument. not weighing in is a good option for those like this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

abusing the pardon system is not pardoning people that we don’t like.

Dummy

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That’s not the point though and I think you know.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Did a former Democratic president say he was going to make life difficult for his enemies? Nope.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

Gross. Way to role model being the party of social equality.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

are you joking? hunter filled out a form wrong.

who could possibly care?

pop your head out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

He pleaded guilty to 3 felonies and 6 misdemeanors for not paying $1.4 million over 3 years, including making false deductions and dipping into company funds. That’s not “filling out a form wrong”, and if it is, his father should pardon everyone who has been charged under the bad laws that allow people simply “filling out a form wrong” to catch 9 charges. Especially for the people who couldn’t afford accountants and lawyers to file the form correctly for them.

Pardoning your own son only for any possible federal crime, not just the ones he was charged with, especially after saying you wouldn’t, is gross nepotism. And the pardon starts from 2014 when the tax and gun charges are for 2016 onwards, which implies there’s more Joe Biden knows about.

permalink
report
parent
reply

are you joking? hunter filled out a form wrong.

Tell it to these chuds talking about death of democracy or whatever.

This was a witchhunt targeted at Hunter only because he’s Joe Biden’s son. Good on him on doing this after that Orange cunt gloated how he’s going to come after ‘Biden crime family’.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4045934-trump-vows-to-appoint-special-prosecutor-to-go-after-biden-if-former-president-wins-in-2024/

permalink
report
parent
reply

Interesting Global News

!globalnews@lemmy.zip

Create post

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn’t have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title format

Post title should mirror the news source title.

URL format

Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.

[Opinion] prefix

Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English only

Title and associated content has to be in English.

2. No social media posts

Avoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.

3. Respectful communication

All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.

4. Inclusivity

Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.

5. Ad hominem attacks

Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can’t argue your position without attacking a person’s character, you already lost the argument.

6. Off-topic tangents

Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.

7. Instance rules may apply

If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

Community stats

  • 4.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.4K

    Posts

  • 4.1K

    Comments

Community moderators