9 points

permalink
report
reply
38 points

Reminder that World War 2 had a gradual unfolding of declarations of war across several months or longer, depending on how you want to fuck that pig. I think we’re already in the onset of WWIII, in some sense.

permalink
report
reply
10 points
*

That’s terrifying because WW3 risks the use of nuclear weapons and every model of nuclear exchange that has been run always escalates to mutual assured destruction with billions dead and the end of civilization.

I just finished listening to the audiobook of Nuclear War: A scenario by Annie Jacobsen. Highly recommend it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

The real slippery slopes are graded much less steeply than you’d expect

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Civilization’s kinda shit anyway. We had a good run.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

gg guys, see you all next millennium.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

The thing is, if NATO is worth anything at all. Hitting a NATO country would bring a lot of declarations in a very short order. It would get very WW3, very quickly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Same way you go bankrupt; slowly, and then all at once.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

That’s assuming Europe wasn’t economically stretched already, and America didn’t have an incoming president who wasn’t more interested in fellating Putin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Even if there’s financial concerns in Europe. We DO have reasonably strong airforces, modern weaponry and several nuclear enabled countries. I think it would be a big risk to take in their current position.

My main concern is Trump tries to coerce Europe to leave Ukraine to fight alone. It all depends on how much in Putin’s pocket he is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

and America didn’t have an incoming president who wasn’t more interested in fellating Putin.

That is a bit of a wildcard, isn’t it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Europe isn’t nearly so financially stretched as Russia, and its economy is an order of magnitude bigger.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Europe hasn’t even started stretching. The fact it refuses to is the reason it looks stretched.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Are we in the Spanish Civil War type pre-phase of WWII?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I’m not sure we’re on a path to WWIII if it’s Russia vs everyone else. If China decides to get involved then maybe but I don’t see any evidence they’re willing to throw in with Putin, same with Iran.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

No there’s not. Where are you getting this absolute certainty from?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This is what I have been saying too. I think we will look back on this time and refer to it as the start of ww3.

Also technology is completely different than it ever has been. Like there was not a big tome or tech difference between ww1 and ww2. So a modern world war would look completely different making it difficult to identify.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

So far it’s been lots more grenade drones and cyber warfare than you got in the 20th century. Asymmetry is the name of the game, aside from urban positional fighting and more traditional focus on logistics and supply lines.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Nah, they’re already in the Brexit corner of shame for the next 15 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
85 points

Hitting London with a ballistic missile would bring the rents down. Maybe this is a good thing.

permalink
report
reply
27 points

Well it would likely put them up, seeing as it would remove supply but, if you know Londoners you’ll know it won’t do a damn thing about demand.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

At least they have good public transportation. But yeah, anyone making less than £100,000 a year, good luck finding anywhere with a train commute of under an hour.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

We moved into a home county. I grew up in London, but it’s just too expensive. We could have gotten a place there, but it would not be a good one, not be in a good area and likely be beyond our personal budget (the banks would give us the money, we wouldn’t accept it).

Not regretting it at all really.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

As a bonus, London is no more

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

These things aren’t accurate enough to hit much so as long as he puts conventional warheads on it like he did for Dnipro, it won’t do much.

permalink
report
parent
reply
67 points
*

Please do it Putin. WE want the excuse, NATO wants the excuse, Poland’s chomping champing at the bit for the excuse and we really want to see how long it takes them to rush Moscow.

Edit: damn it Lemmy, I’m an engineer not a dictionary.

permalink
report
reply
39 points

Pushes glasses in It’s actually “champing.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Language evolves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Skibidi chomp

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

How do horses “champ” at their bit?

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Exuberantly, with a shade of impetuousness

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Champ is the older spelling of chomp. They mean the same thing. At some point a shift in pronunciation occurred and spelling has reflected that, but the older version has been preserved in the phrase “champ at the bit”

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Didn’t know this, thanks!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

“My subscribers are pogchamping me, Simperial. Can you say the same?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Lukashenko: why are there troops with wings sprayed on their vehicles massing near my border?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Poland: Just a regular training, nothing to worry about

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

THEN THE WINGED HUSSARS ARRIVED

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I know this is a joke, but some people might actually have this mindset and that is very very dangerous.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
5 points

Fighting for Ukraine against the head oligarch of Russia? Yes.

Fighting for oil interests of oligarchs in Londongrad? No.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

Which is exactly why he’s not going to, and everyone knows it. This is to look strong for his own domestic audience.

The threat that’s actually for us is the one about arming it’s own anti-Western proxies, and it did indeed make us think twice for a few months.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

WE want the excuse, NATO wants the excuse

Are you ready to enlist?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

Sure, with my skillset I’ll be designing and building drones by the 1000s. If that is what is required to stop a tyrant from threatening Europe hand me a long brown overcoat, hat, cigarette, and FRSKY radio transmitter!

Edit: I should emphasize, I’d rather not fight if not necessary. I’d rather be in my current job creating equipment for infrastructure that will power the green energy transition.

However, I have studied history and there are times where conflict is unavoidable especially when dealing with power mad dictators. The countries of Europe deserve to live in peace to find their own paths without the threat to their borders and sovereignty. Russia itself deserves a government that works for everyone not just the dozen oligarchs in Moscow.

Oh and for the record, fuck US imperialism (though they are a NATO ally) and fuck the CCP, yes you tankies can fuck off as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

How very brave of you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-30 points
*

So you’ve signed up by tomorrow then right? Expect you back in here with proof or you could stfu.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’ll go back just to fuck Putin.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 8.7K

    Posts

  • 97K

    Comments