36 points

Probably good that nobody asks you

permalink
report
reply
-39 points

Why are you in this com?

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points
*

To fight against your misleading propaganda.

Do these children live in happy, healthy homes?

…or are they resented every day by their parents that were forced to have them, slowly building up childhood trauma that, by all studies on the topic, will never be resolved and will always plague them?

…or are they forced into the already-overburdened foster system, where children are regularly abused and neglected? Oh, and just to be clear, you’re aware that Texas has among the most crowded systems in the country, right?

Ohhhh sorry, I forgot you’re all just pro-birth instead of pro-life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-33 points

So, what, kill everyone who can’t live in a healthy home?

This mindset is insane and it’s so weird that people who hold it act like they have the moral high ground or something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Heinous to use someone’s tragic image and story beside your headline.

permalink
report
reply
24 points
*

Also, “just” 3 deaths we know of. If you have read literally anything about abortions pre-Roe, I guarantee you that you’re potentially missing at least one and maybe 2 zeros behind that. This also doesn’t account for women who have been irreversibly harmed from attempting to access or perform off-the-books abortion care, or those who have to carry to term a child when pregnancy might harm them.

Also, “only” 3 deaths is still a tragedy. Those people had families. They had friends, coworkers, and lives. At least one of them was literally still a child. Trying to play a numbers game between people dead because of a law and the number of “babies saved” is ghoulish behavior.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-23 points

So by your hypothetical count with zero support behind it, you could only come up with 300 dead potentially in the absolute worst case scenario vs 50,000 saved. So 49700 lives net.

Why do you want to kill babies? Are you just an evil person?

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Let me turn that around: why are you OK with letting an 18 year old bleed to death, painfully, from what is an absolutely treatable condition because nobody would perform care that was too legally close to an abortion? Why are you OK with women dying and being harmed irreparably?

https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2024/analysis-suggests-2021-texas-abortion-ban-resulted-in-increase-in-infant-deaths-in-state-in-year-after-law-went-into-effect

And on the subject, why are YOU ok with killing babies?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

Where are you getting that 50k number from? Is it based on the number of abortions performed in 2021? You don’t, perhaps, think that women might be getting abortions out of state, or relying on better birth control methods, or are resorting to smuggling in Plan B? You think it’s really a 1-to-1?

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points
*

Truly disgusting that you think any women dying is acceptable, let alone a “damn good trade”.

permalink
report
reply
-16 points

Ironic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-36 points

But you’re okay with dead babies?

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

You literally posted a link to a story about a woman who was hoping to see her pregnancy through to the end. This woman didn’t want an abortion but I guarantee you she wanted to live. And here you are celebrating her death. That’s disgusting.

I bet you and I agree on a lot of things and about wanting to see less abortions. I think the answer is pretty easy. Better access to sex education. More access to contraceptives and family planning. And laws that don’t punish doctors for saving the lives of their patients.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-31 points

We’re not celebrating her death. We’re celebrating the massive statistical success of the abortion laws.

I honestly just saw the article, went “just 3”? And posted it here. Turns out, abortion largely isn’t about saving lives, it’s using it as a psychopathic birth control.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points
*

Oh look another disgusting take on reducing women to bargaining chips while also neglecting to acknowledge that infant mortality is on the rise.

Shame on you OP.

permalink
report
reply
-28 points

Oh look, a lefty that supports murdering babies! What could we do without lefties murdering babies?

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Completely ignoring the infant mortality rates going up have you? What’s the matter? Doesn’t fit your narrative?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-19 points

255 more dead infants vs 50,000 saved. Magnitudes more have been saved than those lost.

Fits my narrative pretty good.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No babies are murdered.

It’s only considered as a baby once it’s born.

Until then it’s a fetus.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

I can’t wait for a portion of these 50k babies to be blamed for increase in crime, drug use and poverty.

permalink
report
reply
-18 points

Anything to justify murdering them I guess

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Do you support the death penalty, or are you too thick to understand the difference between murder and abortion?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-21 points
*

I do, I just don’t pretend that fetuses do anything worthy of being put to death.

Edit: bonkers response lol, these are like the worst abortion arguments I’ve heard in my life. If y’all are gonna advocate for murdering babies at least be better at it lollllllll

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

It will justify their slave labor in prisons. Shame they’re parents had sex without thinking of the consequences.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Conservative

!conservative@lemm.ee

Create post

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee’s rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don’t reply to it.

Community stats

  • 507

    Monthly active users

  • 452

    Posts

  • 3.2K

    Comments