One reason to do something like this would be if you were planning to disrupt the international supply chain by perhaps putting tariffs on China, keeping local unions happy to the point where they would not jump on a chance to strike during a supply chain disruption would be an effective way to minimize the adverse effects of tariffs and wars for that matter.
You could also just read this as an appeal to union members who voted for Trump to keep them a part of the Republican coalition.
Isn’t “pro-union republican” an oxymoron?
Another reason is that unions have been getting increasing support from the general population, reversing decades of declining support.
Wtf is with them using the word “taps”. Not blaming you OP, it’s clearly in the article’s title. But I see it over and over and over again.
Not isolated, every time the stock market loses 2% is “plummets” or “plunges”. Every time a fighter jet is sent to intercept something, it’s “scrambled.”
Like they all use the same lexicon.
As far as I’m aware, “taps” is a sports reference. As in, to tap somebody in.
Your other complaints aren’t related.
I thought it referred to the colloquialism “a tap on the shoulder,” but I looked that up on DDG and apparently it means “a request to resign.” That’s the opposite of what I inferred.
Suddenly, a John Scalzi book I recently read and which overused the phrase makes a lot more sense.
needs a few for scripted, ‘you’re fired’ episodes.
