94 points

to me, shaving Android off their business (suggested next step if this fails) would be way more impactful

permalink
report
reply
66 points

Why not both!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

good point, I guess one worry here is about the way in which this will affect Firefox (note Firefox here, not the Mozilla Fdn who have managed to Elon their own thing without help, seemingly)

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

I’m worrying that whatever gets sold (Chrome or Android) might end up in the hands of someone even more scummy than Google.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

They would have to be more scummy and also at least similarly competent… Google can’t innovate for crap, but they’re pretty good at maintaining projects (when they don’t randomly kill them off)

If they stop work on chromium, or belief in the stewardship of chromium wanes, it’ll fragment the ecosystem again. Which is sorely needed at this point - we need to get back to standards and away from centralized control

Imagine Twitter/musk acquires them. Microsoft, Apple, and many other big companies directly or indirectly rely on a chain now controlled by a group known for mismanagement - are they going to wait and see, or are they going to diversify?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Is there any company more scummy than Google?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Oracle?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Chiquita and Nestlé come to mind. Within tech industry, I’d say Amazon and probably Microsoft are worse as well, and there’s probably a ton of potentially even worse companies lurking in the shadows outside the top of the economic food chain.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I don’t know man. There’s a lot shittier business practices out there than paying to be the default search engine - which is laughably easy to change on any browser. Like marketplaces and services that pay to be exclusive sources of content and then use the fact that they’re the only source for most content to force extortionate deals on content creators and enshitify every aspect of the end user experience. Just to name one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

All the big ones constantly trade blows for the no 1 spot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Chrome, brought to you by Palantir, heck, what if Musk bought it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I think Google is putting their eggs in one basket (Android) in preparation for them selling off chrome. They are already killing ChromeOS.

https://www.androidauthority.com/chrome-os-becoming-android-3500661/

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Android also becoming chrome OS in light of recent news of developing Android desktop mode and native Android compatibility with Linux apps, looks like they make hybrid OS that could do it all

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

if Google was to sell Android that would be like a nuclear bomb dropping. I mean aside from budget Android phones people are going more and more to apple devices just because of the stability.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

The next day, the Chrome division is sold off to a new company “Bloogle” and we’re back to square dumb.

And before you think about applying for a job there, know that the new company is still demanding mandatory 5 days in the office

permalink
report
reply
36 points

If Google does not set the price for 200 trillion USD and it can be really bought, then it will be probably M$ and they will change the search engine to Bing and integrate Coplilot or whatever the fuck it is called now into it.

permalink
report
reply
30 points

Pretty sure that would count as monopoly as well and the sale wouldn’t be approved.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

And I was pretty sure them aquiring Activision Blizzard would count as monopolizing but here we are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Did you consider that Microsoft lawyers said prices wouldn’t go up? Cause they did, they did say that, which is why the merger was approved. Do you think lawyers can just lie? Don’t you think it’s much more fair now that companies can make pinky promises that prices won’t go up before they become more monopolistic. That’s just good business for both customers and businesses /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Imagine being a monopoly and still being 3rd place out of three in your field.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Why does it need to be sold to another big company, why can’t they just break Google up so chrome becomes its own business?

permalink
report
reply
15 points

Chrome by itself would likely cost 100 billion dollars to sell, and then more to maintain, without any clear revenue except selling user data. Chrome is not a profitable product on its own. Not many companies can afford that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Well shucks, I guess it should just be made fully open source, the code distributed, and the business dissolved. Womp wooomp.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

The overwhelming majority of development to Chromium is done by Google and not the open source contributors to the project. Maintaining a browser is not something that can be done for free as a hobby. It requires an army of full-time developers to sustain.

Given all of the major browsers except Firefox are using Chromium, the best case scenario for spinning off Chrome is that Microsoft would pick up the lion’s share of development to keep Edge up to date.

This is the same reason that all of the major Linux distributions have large foundations to support them.

The DoJ would do less harm to the internet if they just forced Google to sell off Search instead. Then they’d be an advertising and cloud services company that happens to maintain a major browser to serve their ads.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Because chrome doesn’t make any money

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Google could pay chrome billions just like they pay mozillla and apple…

Besides it’s not like that’s really true anyway, chrome would make tons of money independently, it would just sell user data to Google or other parties instead of Google getting it for free. Chrome ‘doesn’t make any money’ because it doesn’t need to on paper, the same way a parking lot doesn’t make any money for a grocery store, but if a third party owned the lot, the grocery store would just pay them to use it, or the individual people using the lot would.

Chrome is the biggest browser and successfully collects data on billions of people, additionally, chrome development would absolutely be supported by all of the companies that build chromium based browsers like Microsoft, opera, brave, etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply

And what’s to stop it from continuing to monopolize search engine usage just because it’ll be owned by another company? Wouldn’t whoever purchases it just continue operating it the same way, banking on the name recognition?

permalink
report
reply
2 points

MS is both wet and salivating right now.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.7K

    Posts

  • 153K

    Comments