Apparently, Bunnings have my face on-file. I don’t think I like that.

0 points

Hoo-fuckin-ray.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

They destroy it but you have no authority of their backup overseas.

permalink
report
reply
4 points
*

Ah, perfect. Another corporation shits on your rights and this time they don’t even get a “cost-of-doing-business” fine.

if just one person could be protected from trauma the use of facial recognition would be “justifiable”.

Funny how gov & corpo’s frame all their crimes as “for your protection”.

“The electronic data was never used for marketing purposes or to track customer behaviour,” Mr Schneider said.

I’d be willing to bet all that I own this is either a complete lie, or by omission.

Commissioner Kind said she didn’t think Bunnings deserved to be financially penalised as they had good intentions when they rolled out the technology and were cooperative with the investigation.

Ahh. If only every criminal received leniency for “good intentions”.

Example# 12753974 that we live in corporate plutocracies masquerading as “democracy”, and there is a separate rule of law for the wealthy/corporations.

But don’t worry, I’m sure the neolibs across LabLib will legalise these violations soon enough — maybe you’ll need to scan your digital GovID™️ to enter any store; for your protection, ofcourse!

permalink
report
reply
40 points

“Protection against organised crime” my arse you could give the fucking cops footage of someone breaking into your house and raping your hamster while shouting their full name and address and they still wouldn’t do shit.

This is about floggable data

permalink
report
reply
6 points

I don’t think they were asking the cops to do anything, they just were refusing people service.

But I agree with your conclusion. If they weren’t using the data for commercial reasons, they were using it as a deniable trial to see what they could get away with.

Fucking Coles is using Palantir and has their checkout face cameras, so I suspect in the wake of this we’ll hear more about this sort of thing with other companies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

My example was to highlight how utterly ridiculous their ‘reasons’ for capturing the data in the first place were. Not to mention none of it would stand up in court as evidence. Bald faced lie

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Had no idea about this with Coles. Fark.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

@eraitch @zero_gravitas If you do use the self-checkouts there you can put a sticky dot over the camera as you approach it. They love it.
And their “AI” exit-gates on the self-checkout pen that shut if it doesn’t think it saw you paying can get in the sea too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

So ahhh, the massive fine?

Did they even get a wrist slap?

permalink
report
reply

Australia

!australia@aussie.zone

Create post

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you’re posting anything related to:

If you’re posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

  • When posting news articles use the source headline and place your commentary in a separate comment
Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn’t show Lemmy Moderators, I’ll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

Community stats

  • 1.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 531

    Posts

  • 3.5K

    Comments