1 point

To be fair, brutalist buildings are fugly

permalink
report
reply
-1 points

I dunno, I think they’re kinda 
 neat, I guess? Like, yeah, they’re technically pretty ugly, but somehow in a way that makes them interesting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Trying
and failing, to think of a good portmanteau of interesting and ugly.

Edit: intugly? Ugteresting?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

To you.

The peak of brutality architecture beats any other type in my eyes. It’s beautiful in a way no other building or style compares.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Unfortunately many brutalistic buildings are far off from its peak and just look like lazily designed gray blobs. High-effort brutalism can look good (or can look inappropriately evil but that’s besides the point); low-effort brutalism always looks cheap.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Low effort brutalism looks cheap because it is. And that’s a good thing. In my country there’s a homeless crisis. The waitlist for government housing is five years. And that’s because too much of the government housing is single family detached houses. The politicians always say “we don’t have enough money to build government housing for everyone who needs it”. You know how many homeless we’d have if the government built soviet block style apartment buildings? Next to none. The people who can live on their own and just don’t have enough money can live in that, the people who need support can stay in the homeless shelters that have support, and only the people who want to be homeless would be left. Brutalism is efficient. American style suburbia is inefficient, so much so that it needs to be subsidized by the government using money taken from the city, because the suburbanites can’t pay for their own single family detached houses, even the ones with high paying jobs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Cheap brutalism can look good.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

They look depressing and I hate being around them. A city should be a nice place to live, not a playground for architects’ experiments

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I like the cut of this dudes jib.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

I do prefer brick buildings.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

I have a fairly functional form of autism, but I sometimes struggle finding balance in points of interest I get enthusiastic about, and nobody really matches my enthusiasm, even though they try. It often feels like rejection, but this post really puts it in perspective for me. I’m not always reasonable/flexible when I’m like that. Thanks for sharing.

(To give an example related to this post; I wouldn’t assault someone for having a different opinion, but I could definitely debate them with a passion that’s a little out of place and not as reasonable as I’d like to believe it is. “Building with concrete blocks? What is even wrong with you, where you never thought proper construction? What do you mean cheap building costs? People who want to build cheap buildings shouldn’t be allowed to build anyway”.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

“Building with concrete blocks? What is even wrong with you, where you never thought proper construction? What do you mean cheap building costs? People who want to build cheap buildings shouldn’t be allowed to build anyway”.

The internet suddenly makes a bit more sense to me

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Love me some good old fachwerkhÀusers

permalink
report
reply

Greentext

!greentext@sh.itjust.works

Create post

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you’re new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

  • Anon is often crazy.
  • Anon is often depressed.
  • Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

Community stats

  • 6.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.1K

    Posts

  • 27K

    Comments