Using tinder like a ranked FPS is surely something
Remeber when greentext was something interesting or toughtfull? Instead of fariytales for incels?
what is tinder elo?
ELO is a term used in ranked competitive video games. Part of this authorās sense of humor is that tinder is a ranked game
edit: see correction below
The concept of āranked competitiveā systems, in general, evolved over time, but if weāre talking about ranked competitive structures in games or sports, we can trace it back to a few key milestones in history:
Ancient and Medieval Competitions: Even in ancient civilizations, competitive games, including some forms of organized sports or games like wrestling, were often ranked in some way, though these rankings were informal.
Modern Sports Rankings: The formal idea of ranking athletes based on performance in a competitive environment began to take shape in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, especially with the establishment of professional leagues. For example:
Tennis established its first official ranking system in the 1910s. Golf created a ranking system (the āOfficial World Golf Rankingā) in 1986.
All of this was way before chess was invented, around 2014 or so.
Can women message people on Tinder they havenāt matched with?
And if this was effective wouldnāt it lower all womenās Elo scores? Unless he only ignored one group and catfished everybody else. Sounds like a lot of work.
No, only tinder premium can do so IIRC.
Bumble? From memory women can only message first, men must wait to be messaged before they can.
Itās been a while since I used those platforms so my information could be incorrect.
Bumble is moving away from having women message first as apparently it was too much of a burden for the women on that app (According to https://www.npr.org/2024/05/06/1249296671/bumble-dating-apps-women-opening-moves )
Understandable as I find having to generate an opener hard too. Kinda a shame though as the point was to give them a place to have some more control with the interactions.
As a man who would often get matches but rarely get so much as a āhiā to allow the conversation to start (iād say only 1/8 of the matches would say anything in the 24h), I really wonder why. A number of women apparently never read that they were supposed to send a message first when using bumble (I did hear that more than once on the app), but others? Why?
Yeah, the old Bumble model was better (in my opinion as a man). It creates incentive to have an interesting profile with stuff people can comment on. The newer āopening moveā thing incentivizes generic responses. Bumble (in my experience) still has women message first far more often than Tinder though. You may just have to wait and not message immediately.
Creating an opening message is only really difficult if someone has a generic boring profile, so if itās an issue for anyone maybe thatās why.
I think this is an unrealized thought experiment by op. I donāt believe the Chad he imagines has any relation to the man most woman are looking for.
Op creates profile that makes him look rich and stupid.
Gets targeted by bots using ai generated images of mildly attractive women.
Thinks heās actually attracting human beings.
Anon still has never willingly gotten the attention of a human woman besides his mother