0 points

Hydro alters environments, stick with nuclear.

permalink
report
reply

If it requires a dam to be build in that area then for sure. However, there are some locations which can take advantage of the natural landscape such as Niagara falls.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Nuclear waste sucks!

BUT: We already have about 60 years worth of it, and we need to find a long term storage solution regardless.

And assuming we would double the amount of nuclear waste, then it would only take one additional half-time to decay.

Go nuclear!

permalink
report
reply
0 points

Spent fuel rod reactors are well into development, and they will be able to use that waste to generate power and leave behind non-radioactive materials.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Yes that’s true but that’s also not the point. The point is that we already have a problem and making it twice the size doesn’t make it twice as bad

permalink
report
parent
reply

solarpunk memes

!memes@slrpnk.net

Create post

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a “meme” here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server’s ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators’ discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

Community stats

  • 5.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 290

    Posts

  • 3.6K

    Comments