Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

Last week’s thread

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this)

9 points

I know we’re trying to cut back on the US politics for the sake of everyone’s sanity, but Musk getting sneered by his own confabulator is still pretty good.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

is the s in esrtweets for “shitty”? because holy fuck are they shitty

permalink
report
reply
6 points

libertarianism.tweet

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

no part of me is surprised that every famous FOSS personality has a ridiculously bad age of consent take, but it is a real fucking problem that this keeps happening

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You’re being perhaps too generous to consider ESR a famous FOSS personality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

dunno, it’s definitely up there. maybe not a recent one, and I could understand people sub-25 perhaps not knowing the name, but across a fair bit of the foss space the name is household

unfortunately

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

He’s definitely up there, or at least used to be. The Cathedral and the Bazaar, his attempt to justify why Linux is more successful than GNU or BSD, used to be very much a part of the open source canon. He cofounded OSI. He forked some POP3 client to make his own bad and insecure one called Fetchmail, then refused to improve it.

Personally I’m happy to know he’s become less relevant nowadays.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

On top of the disgusting subject matter, why do these people think that even unlimited-character Twitter is a good format for posting these screeds? The site design, even on the main site, is absolutely terrible for presenting this much writing. Everything mashed into the constrained center column means way too many line breaks, meaning it’s a chore to read. Same thing with that freak Ackman; whatever overwrought bullshit he was posting just made my eyes glaze over.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

yikes on bikes

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Least insane ESR post

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

If you find yourself saying

There isn’t a single good term in English for people who are post-pubertal but below the legal age of consent or majority

you may already be morally diseased.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Crossposting this thread from nottheonion@lemmy.world with the fortune article “Elon Musk’s AI turns on him, labels him ‘one of the most significant spreaders of misinformation on X’”. The article itself is nothing much, but it does have this quote:

The smackdown from his own AI system, ironically, came soon after Musk touted the system to his followers in a tweet reading “Use Grok for answers that are based on up-to-date info!”

A little delicious irony is fine as a treat.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Got recommended a video from a friend, and its a damn good sneer at the state of YouTube sponsorships:

Why YouTube Sponsors Are (Almost) Always Terrible

permalink
report
reply
7 points

It amazes me how well SponsorBlock works and how bad YouTube feels without it. I guess the main downside is that it’s a little harder to tell the good 'toobers with strong moral backbone who don’t shill awful shit in the first place from those whose sponsor segments merely get automatically skipped.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
10 points

Didn’t have that on my bingo card for this year, but it’s on brand. A big part of The Onion’s MO is just riding out the insanity and inject a little of their own.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Hate to break this, but https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/elon-musk-x-corp-alex-jones-infowars-rcna180487

Seems he is now fully sold on the idea that this is his world, we’re just living in it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Oh my god, that is right on the edge between making all of this either a lot more depressing or even funnier.

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 1.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 416

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments

Community moderators