I feel like this is probably pretty effective. I feel like it should be a thing.

E: see also https://beehaw.org/post/16953380 E2: https://19thnews.org/2024/11/4b-movement-south-korea-social-media-trump-presidency/

14 points

Ciswomen were having sex?

Then wait, why are there so many incels?

Joking aside, there actually have been times when I’ve been at a social event and I’m gonna fuck a guy because why not… but he starts going off on incel bullshit and how far right he is because “Women aren’t women” anymore, and I’m like… “Yeah I gotta go…” while thinking “Can’t believe he talked his way OUT of a sure thing.”

So I fully understand why there are so many incels.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

“Can’t believe he talked his way OUT of a sure thing.”

People are great at stealing defeat from the jaws of victory!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Kind of the theme of the week, no?

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Me, a lesbian: Aktivsm

permalink
report
reply
21 points
*

I mean, considering how many incels voted for trump, I think we’re pretty much already there. Many of the young men who voted red this election already have no close relationships with any women their age. Obviously women should exercise their autonomy as they see fit. I don’t expect it to change how anyone votes.

I’ll probably be downvoted for this, but progressives have spent the last several years actively shutting down lines of communication with men, particularly white men. For the best of reasons, sure, but it hasn’t been an effective strategy for winning elections.

Maybe this would sway some group of center-left men who didn’t bother voting, but realistically I expect it will have no effect on the ongoing polarization, or exagerrate it.

permalink
report
reply
48 points

so, because punishing all women is bad, it’s a good idea to punish all men?
here’s an alternative: don’t fuck republicans… they’re the ones trying to control women.

permalink
report
reply
56 points
*

It’s not punishing anyone as much as asserting our bodily autonomy, but go off. Targeting Republicans means no pressure is applied to anyone else to change society. Not every woman will participate in the strike. The effects of it have to be wide reaching.

It’s a widespread denial of the institutions behind gender relationships. Saying that the system is dangerous for women and refusing to participate in it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

but go off.

oh look, zero chance that you’re actually trying to have a conversation… yaaay internet.

Not every woman will participate in the strike.

almost none will, but if they did, it’s not going to be republican women….

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

They could’ve been telling you to go off because the not all men argument is unnecessary and pedantic. Obviously it’s not all men, but it’s enough of them that nobody should have to specify only the misogynists, racists, rapists, etc.

It has always been bizarre to me that good people lump themselves in with them. You don’t have to be defensive! You can understand nuance!

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

They’re not obligated to date men though, if they want to participate in 4B then I don’t see what’s wrong with that. They are allowed to assert their bodily autonomy, it’s a form of protest against how they are treated

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

go ahead and pretend like i’m saying women are obligated to do something or not….
i’m not saying anything like that, but go ahead and argue with imaginary people

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Okay cool. So if we agree that individuals are not obligated to date men, then it follows that choosing not to do so is not a punishment towards men. A punishment requires a penalty or deprivation, and since dating is not a requirement, there can be no deprivation occurring.

This movement was not created to punish some men who feel entitled to a relationship, it’s (primarily) to advocate for their rights and against the expectations they are subject to.


It has been pointed out to me that it might constitute a punishment for a subset of entitled men so this is not entirely accurate. That said, I would still say it is unjustified to frame this as a punishment of all men, especially considering that subset of entitled men likely constitutes of the very people in favor of removing rights from women.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I give it about 6 months of this strategy before conservative men will be paid to pretend to be leftists in order to impregnate women, so I understand the “don’t fuck any man” strategy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

They already do that btw

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

There are lots of men that hide how conservative they are to get their dick wet. It’s been this way for at least 13 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s been that way for a lot longer than that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Its not punishing all men, its punishing conservative men.

4B doesnt neex to apply for leftist men

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You really don’t think guys won’t lie to get laid?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Honestly it’s really easy to suss out someone’s political opinions if you just try a little bit

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Well… They didn’t say that. So you’ll have to forgive people for thinking it applies to all men.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

lol… sure….

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

The problem, if you look at the data, is lots of women voted for Trump too.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

White women specifically. I’m sure they’re uneducated also

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

There’s women who say they’d vote against womens right to vote, you can’t trust people to vote for their best interests.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Politics

!politics@beehaw.org

Create post

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it’s a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:
  • Where possible, post the original source of information.
    • If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
  • Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
  • Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
  • Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
  • Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 1.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 716

    Posts

  • 3.1K

    Comments