Lobsters go the other way though…
Cyclist hate this not because of the danger it pose, but because it’s not aero.
Thats because its… HYDRODYNAMICALLY DESIGNED
Wouldn’t a lobster technically be waterodynamic? Or eauodynamic? What’s Latin for water…?
Well… duh? A fairer comparison would be the cow vs jeep. A sea creature vs something designed for land isn’t that great of a comparison because water is thick enough that you’re going to need some kind of aerodynamic (fluodynamic?) adaptation to survive. Air is thin enough that evolution can sacrifice some aerodynamics for other traits.
So is a cow more aerodynamic than a Jeep? Edit: Nevermind, it got kind of answered in another thread.