-46 points

Until today, I’ve been thoroughly in favor of supporting Ukraine. Since Ukraine isn’t going to get any support from the next administration, rushing out a final aid package (if the current administration can even manage that) only seems like it will briefly delay Russia’s slow victory.

I’d like to be shown that I’m wrong. Please comment if you have an outlook that’s more positive than mine.

permalink
report
reply
7 points
*

With Trump supporting Russia will be a fast victory.

Next aid will be for Russia.
Trump already helped Putin with COVID tests, why not give full support, no one can stop him now

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

There is a tremendous amount of mostly empty Ukrainian land left. If Russia wants it all, their casualties will end in the millions, even without additional US aid. We’re not the only suppliers, after all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

I have one, hear me out: it looks like the current german gov will decide to give up and have early elections. Current polls suggest that Merz will become chancellor. On multiple occasions he criticized Scholz for his cautious approach and voiced his support for Taurus deliveries. Not sure if he will go through but I think he specifically mentioned Taurus so often and prominently that it won’t be easy to back pedal now. So it’s likely that Taurus (and with it the Kerch bridge?) is back on the menu.

(Imho he’s quite a shitty politician otherwise, but maybe he can get at least this right)

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

With the current Zeitgeist, I’m afraid of a landslide win for the AfD

But maybe I just lost hope…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Schwarz-Blau dem Fotzenfritz, klingt doch super

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

Well, we don’t actually know that the next administration won’t support them any. We assume they won’t because of Trump’s attitude to Ukraine, but the republicans have been somewhat divided over the issue, and Trump just does whatever he randomly feels like, and sending more military aid does benefit the MIC that can pay politicians, so it possible, if unlikely, that they’d get some support from them. There’s also the possibility of support from Europe or elsewhere in the world. Finally, while a Ukrainian loss without foreign support seems quite likely, the pace of Russia’s advances and resource expendature are such that a win for them is no longer likely to be “annex Ukraine or make it a puppet rump state”, but more “take a strip of land close to the current occupation line”, in which case a stronger Ukraine has a better negotiating position and so may be able to give up less.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Maybe the EU gets its shit together… this could be for the good on the long run

permalink
report
parent
reply
-105 points

Why? Spend the money here.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

Jesus fucking Christ, do you think we are shipping crates of Benjamins to Ukraine?

Are you really this fucking stupid? Clearly the majority of people in the United States are the dumbest motherfuckers alive, so I just need clarification.

That money is spent here. The money gets pumped into the US economy.

We get rid of ancient military equipment, Ukraine gets a boost, and the US economy gets billions of dollars pumped into it

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Please educated one tell us how many schools do the weapon manufacturers that get these checks build?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Mmm no, I’m aware they don’t send money. I certainly never said that. And by spend, I mean on the people, not giving it to weapons manufacturers who definitely aren’t putting that money back into the economy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points

Fucking idiot. The replacement weapons will be made here and paid to companies here

permalink
report
parent
reply
-41 points

We don’t need to give money to conservative owned weapon manufacturers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Then buy a weapons plant

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Good lord you’re stupid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

What’s your opinion about lend lease on WW2?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Bro he is on crack & opium. Also known als copium 😂 He doesn’t even now what his Point was to begin with 😂

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s not how it works bub.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

How what works?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

The money stays in the US if that’s what you meant?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-22 points

Yes. As much as I support Ukraine, it’s a waste of money at this point. Russia can go forever. We need to spend money here to brace for impact.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Russia actually can’t go on forever. There’s a reason they’re having to buy bottom of the barrel artillery shells from North Korea of all places. They’ve had gigantic reserves from the cold war to burn through, but they have been burning through it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Russia+NKorea surely can’t go longer than US and Europe, look at the numbers in economy, population etc. Even if the US pulls out, Europe on its own would have more than enough resources to outspend Putin. It’s a matter of political will, that’s all. If Europe would be equally commited to Ukraine then Russia wouldn’t stand a chance. So whether it’s a waste of money or not now is a question of whether Europe is willing to properly support Ukraine. I guess you could make the point that it’s about time we finally decide this, but the means surely are there and at our disposal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

You think they are venmoing Ukraine?

The aid is for weapons delivery via 2 paths:

  1. Write off appropriation and backfill of mothballed stock we already needed to rotate out or destroy, due to shelf life

  2. Net new construction of weapons for immediate delivery to Ukraine. That construction happens in the US and us partner nations, and provides the US valuable use Intel as a cherry on top.

It’s valuable spending either way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points

I do not think they use Venmo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Bro they do. Just today I got a message from Zelensky asking me to send him $500 for a tank ticket to Donetsk. Being a patriot I am, I obviously did my part.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

There are also direct money transfers and guarantees for loans and other financial instruments.

As for mothballed weapons, it’s often cheaper to deliver them to Ukraine than to dispose of them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

That, along with Russia not congratulating Trump are the only things giving me some hope Trump might pivot with the right push. “We made an amazing deal, Ukraine will cheaply dispose of our old weapons and punish those filthy ungrateful Russians” would be very much on brand for Trump if you insert a bunch of rambling in the middle.

permalink
report
parent
reply
138 points

We should give them enough gear to substantially weaken our own military.

The Dems need to learn to play dirty. Biden needs to de-fang his own office as much as possible in the next 2 months. And as official acts, he can do it with the Court’s blessing.

Stop taking the high road and burn the fucking White House down before Trump can take it back.

permalink
report
reply
9 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Gift the entirety of military resources not stationed in CONUS to NATO allies. If the plan was to try to strong-arm our allies for protection, literally take the ammo away.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Those NATO allies (Poland) don’t even intercept Russian missiles when they enter Polish air space. Belarus has a better track record of shooting down Russian drones.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Because they’ve been told by the US they’re not allowed to use their US supplied arms to do so. They’ve been asking for permission for at least a year. Refer also constraints placed on Ukraine

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

And as official acts, he can do it with the Court’s blessing.

You forget, the courts only would use that logic to help republicans and hinder democrats.

Precedent has no meaning to these fucks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Well, he’s also like 4 heartbeats from death. Might as well go out with a bang.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

why didn’t we do this before

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Because the military-industrial complex needed to slow-drip the weapons to make the war last as long as possible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Maybe democrats expected a negative effect on the ballots because of it. Macron did something similar while running against le pen on last year? and released the package as soon as the ellection was settled

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s still the same as before and nothing on the level USA does for Israel where they happily intercept rockets for that rich, well armed count with an installed iron dome air defense.

Still no US air raids on Donbas and Crimea and such.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

What took them so fucking long?

permalink
report
reply

Ukraine

!ukraine@sopuli.xyz

Create post

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW

Server Rules
  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

Donate to support Ukraine’s Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


Community stats

  • 3.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.5K

    Posts

  • 12K

    Comments