23 points

Probably an unpopular opinion, but I instead installed an extension to force shorts to play as normal videos. Some channels have shorts worth watching (imo), but this prevents endless scrolling through short after short, I have to intentionally choose to watch them by clicking on the specific thumbnail, every time.

I find it a decent compromise.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Agreed. There is some exclusive content by my favorite creators that wouldnt really work as long form content.
If it just wasnt vertical…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

whats the extension’s name? + is it on ff?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
1 point

thanks!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Just to give a little bit of context, shorts can natively played as videos by replacing the www.youtube.com/shorts/[…} url with www.youtube.com/watch?v=[…], so a simple url replacer will do as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
96 points

“BuT mAnIfEsT v3 wIlL pRoTeCt UsErS fRoM mAlIcIoUs ExTeNsIoNs.”

permalink
report
reply
75 points

MV3 is clearly an adblocker sabotage op by Google, it shouldn’t even be disputed at this point. The sooner people understand this the better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*

Everything google does at this point is to squeeze pennies from their revenue streams. They have become destiny manifested for enshittification.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Similar for Facebook, Microsoft etc. It will be interesting to see how long before they start to lose market dominance, or how anti trust laws work worldwide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

You can just uBlock the thing on the front page.

If your browser recently tried killing uBlock - switch.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

I’ve been able to nix so many intrusive web elements with the ublock picker tool, often without leaving a trace due to modern web design practices. The YouTube shorts shelf is one such case, and it’s shocking how well it worked!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah, uBlock mostly just adds CSS rules as display:none, and Google still pretends that’s some kind of security nightmare.

Because they’re an abusive monopoly that must be shattered.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

phew it’s not unhook

permalink
report
reply
30 points

A Chrome extension titled “Hide YouTube Shorts,” used by 100,000 people, was recently discovered to secretly collect users’ browser activity, raising serious concerns about user privacy on Google Chrome Web Store.

permalink
report
reply

Cybersecurity

!cybersecurity@sh.itjust.works

Create post

c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.

THE RULES

Instance Rules

  • Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  • No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  • No Ads / Spamming.
  • No pornography.

Community Rules

  • Idk, keep it semi-professional?
  • Nothing illegal. We’re all ethical here.
  • Rules will be added/redefined as necessary.

If you ask someone to hack your “friends” socials you’re just going to get banned so don’t do that.

Learn about hacking

Hack the Box

Try Hack Me

Pico Capture the flag

Other security-related communities !databreaches@lemmy.zip !netsec@lemmy.world !securitynews@infosec.pub !cybersecurity@infosec.pub !pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub

Notable mention to !cybersecuritymemes@lemmy.world

Community stats

  • 1.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.2K

    Posts

  • 2.2K

    Comments