I’ve been using paru. Just wanted to know if aura is, in your opinion, better than paru and why.

30 points

Neither. Use yay, because it sounds happy.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Hehe

I’m using yay, because it was “the new thing”, when I switched to Arch (and Arch-based systems)

But after that I’ve stopped comparing

Is there anything new, that is actually worth switching from yay?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Paru was at one point a rewrite of yay in Rust, and has since continued development as a pseudo parallel fork. It’s good. Dunno if it’s worth switching, you’d have to see if there’s any specific features you might happen to want, but they’re both fine

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Thanks! :⁠-⁠)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Maybe there’s builtin customizepkg or custom repo support in some helper?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I love typing ‘yay kitty’ on a new install

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

And now I must follow suit

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

+1 for happy tool

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Switched to yay after yaourt was abandoned and never looked back.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

For me paru, but never tried Aura

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Never used aura but paru is great specially if you also install bat for colored PKGBUILDs.

Makes reading them much easier. I never did before doing this.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

I have decided against Aura because it splits the commands for AUR from the standard repos. With paru I can upgrade both by running just paru. In the end, that’s all I mostly do with an aur helper.

permalink
report
reply

Arch Linux

!archlinux@lemmy.ml

Create post

The beloved lightweight distro

Community stats

  • 102

    Monthly active users

  • 127

    Posts

  • 437

    Comments

Community moderators