So, who else was proposing to pay for peer-review time? I’d be concerned if there was some sort of pay-for-result that seemed tied to this, but I don’t see any evidence of that from this article. Aspersions are cast, but nothing of substance is there to say that the process isn’t impartial.
just science related topics. please contribute
note: clickbait sources/headlines aren’t liked generally. I’ve posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry
Rule 1) Be kind.
lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about
I don’t screen everything, lrn2scroll
3.8K
Monthly active users
587
Posts
4.7K
Comments
