I haven’t read the whole thread yet, but so far the choice line is:

I like how you just dropped the “Vance is interested in right authoritarianism” like it’s a known fact to base your entire point on. Vance is the clearest demonstration of a libertarian the republicans have in high office. It’s an absurd ad hominem that you try to mask in your wall of text.

-21 points

Downvoting because this is a link to Reddit instead of the original source.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

your lack of situational awareness is alarming. stop driving, grab a coffee, put your feet up, and take a moment to actually fucking look at what you replied to

it may help

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

The situation is that we should always link to the source, not to another aggregator. This decreases the odds of it becoming a dead link. And that’s before even dealing with the issue that people here are typically explicitly avoiding Reddit.

Then add in that the linked video is a full 3 hours of a Joe Rogan video and no time stamp was provided to tell us what we should be looking for. I’d downnvote a second time just for that if I could.

The problem isn’t me, it’s a lack of awareness on your part.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

holy fuck how are you like this

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Look who AIs self confidence was modeled after.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

The point of this post is ssc. Not vance. The problem is you.

Sneerclub is a point and laugh at the radicalizing Rationlists place not complain about the gop place. (And if you dont know what that is read the rationalwiki (not related to the Rationalists) on lesswrong).

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

this isn’t wikipedia, and the point of this post was not in fact the thing you think it was, you utter and complete raging fuckwit

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

the problem is that you post things here, though i guess that by the time i’m commenting it has been alleviated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

The point was SSCers reacting. Vance being an SSCer isn’t notable as he’s a Thiel creature. SSCers being confronted with the eyeshadowed mirror that is Vance is much more interesting because they spend a lot of time being nominally not exactly what Vance is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Downvoting because you are a dorkus

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Ya know, we used to joke about Ted Cruz being an alien and recording the shape of people’s skulls, as if that were unusual.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Ted Cruz For Human President was a different time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

JD Vance is probably among us as we speak. He could be any username…

Is he you?

I wish, but no.

permalink
report
reply
36 points

“There was a post, [pause], I forget who wrote it” <- the kind of thing I have said several times attempting to avoid leaking rationalist-evidence-bits.

gotta keep that power level under wraps

permalink
report
reply
28 points

“Leaking rationalist-evidence-bits” is an unexpectedly top-tier euphemism for the aftermath of digesting Wendy’s chili

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

This is gold

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Regarding I appreciate he takes a moment here and there to read reddit and sees the content on this sub. Do you think tim walz does?

ahahahahahahahahahahahahh

permalink
report
reply
20 points

The arguments in favour of Walz increase without bound.

permalink
report
parent
reply

SneerClub

!sneerclub@awful.systems

Create post

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

[Especially don’t debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

Community stats

  • 364

    Monthly active users

  • 161

    Posts

  • 2.5K

    Comments