Israel could kill everyone left in Northern Gaza if its assault on the enclave continues, a United Nations relief official warned on Saturday

“Hospitals have been hit, and health workers have been detained. Shelters have been emptied and burned down. First responders have been prevented from saving people from under the rubble. Families have been separated, and men and boys are being taken away by the truckload,”

Msuya estimated that Israel’s actions in the north had killed hundreds and displaced tens of thousands. According to Al Jazeera, an Israeli siege on the north that began earlier in October has killed around 640.

“The Biden-Harris administration must stop the flow of U.S. weapons to Israel which constitutes a necessary step to halting Israel’s ongoing war crimes,” IMEU wrote on social media Saturday. “It’s time for an arms embargo now.”

124 points

That’s been the point the entire time

permalink
report
reply
60 points

The entire population of North Gaza is at risk of dying.

Terrifying, but also completely obvious, and somehow most politicians don’t seem to be upset at the vast loss of innocent life by state terrorism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

It’s because their families aren’t the ones getting bombed…

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

But you see, it’s not me, it’s not my, family, in your head, in your head, they are fighting, with their tanks, and their bombs, and their bombs, and their guns, in your head, they are crying.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Because to them, no lives matter. Except their own of course.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

The blood of their own people is also on their hands… because the IDF and the Netanyahu government uses them as human shields; it’s a fact that they play fast and lose with Israeli lives. Remember that they had intelligence an attack was highly likely around the month of Oct… they still let that music festival continue and didn’t attempt to evacuate or even warn the kibbutz near the walls surrounding Gaza. They wanted any kind of attack to be at least marginally successful so they could justify bulldozing and occupying Gaza so that settlements could commence there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

That’s not true, some of them care about their kids

permalink
report
parent
reply
82 points

If Israel actually completes its mission and kills every man, woman, and child in Palestine, would that make the western powers any more inclined to call it genocide?

permalink
report
reply
44 points

It took us a 100 years to officially recognize the Armenian Genocide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

They would start to “seriously consider the possibility that perhaps something was not right”

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

“We will have to think about scheduling a call to plan a meeting to start having talks about perhaps organising a committee which would make a recommendation as to how we should go about getting ready to write a sternly worded press release (in which we won’t criticise Israel too much).”

The four stage strategy

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

They would still call it Hamas

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Of course not, because they are complicit

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Probably not for a few decades at least. It’s only when today’s college aged people take power that it’ll get labeled as such. And even then, it’s not a guarantee.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Long enough they can make sad movies about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Just think of the profit potential!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Victors may get to write history, but younger generations get to have the last word on it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

Most probably suspect it’s genocide and know they, by not speaking out, at least support it passively. But it just doesn’t matter for their immediate or the near future, so nothing will happen. Thoughts and prayers…

I see two main culprits that enable Israel to eradicate the Palestinian people and their livelihood in manner and speed we see now. The US and germany. Many other western political elites seem far more divided on the topic but probably fear the backlash of speaking out.

70% of the weapons come from the US and they will never stop to supply their FOB. Democrats or republicans will veto everything and make it as hard as possible to even reach a clear global verdict on what happened and how to classify it.

Most of the remaining 30% come from germany.

Here the key argument is that Israel is worthy of unwavering support due to the historical fact of the holocaust and the inhumane acts inflicted on the Jewish population.

Scholz said recently that the security of Israel is a National interest of germany. As a german I feel this too, although for me the state of Israel and the global jewish population we did unspeakable crimes to are not necessarily the same. There are lines that can be crossed that limit my willingness of support. It’s not unconditional and they crossed them. Israel crossed them, not the jews.

I also feel past and present crimes the jewish people had to endure can be used to understand why Israel is acting the way it does but it can’t be a justification of their barbaric way of waging this war against Hamas.

In short, nothing will change. Sorry for the long reply, this shit really grinds my gears.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

US, Germany, UK, Canada, Ireland, Italy, Spain, and many more you have to dig a bit to find the details sometimes

Edit: Here info about Ireland:

I found out the other day from an interview with Irish advocate but here some info about it:

https://www.irishtimes.com/ireland/2024/05/28/sharp-increase-in-export-of-irish-goods-to-israel-that-could-be-used-for-military-purposes-report-shows/

https://www.irishexaminer.com/business/economy/arid-41404601.html

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Most of those make sense to me as lesser culprits.

Ireland does not. Could you explain?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Huh? Ireland? How?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Should have given them a part of Germany then, instead of having the Palestinians pay for your nation’s crimes

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

It was not ours to decide after the war but its an interesting thought. I’d like to see the outcome of that alternative timeline.

Many of the administrative positions were still filled with former Nazis. Most germans in denial of what happened. Also the winning powers seemed far more interested in the spoils of war compared to a just but self-limiting gesture of goodwill.

Sketchy ground for such huge undertaking that would have made german willingness and acceptance paramount.

Also the first thing that comes to my mind is that this decision would jave encaged the victims with the perpetrators. Tough deal to sell to the world.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

They’ll move those goalposts. “We killed everyone in Gaza by having them starve to death but we spared West Bank!”

“We didn’t massacre the Arabs who have Israeli citizenship!”

“We just deported every Arab from Israel and all territory we control, but we didn’t kill them!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Or they’ll say something like ‘well actually, it’s genoslaughter not genocide because israel didn’t mean to kill all the Gazan’s they just did so accidentally.’

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

This is so disgusting. I never wanted to visit Israel even if it was for $free, but now I have even less respect for those Zionist assholes, and I had low respect for them before.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The colonization power couldn’t say the word ceasefire. I don’t think the can say the word genocide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*

That defence holds about such water as a colander. There is so much evidence to the contrary that it boggles the mind. They have bombed hospitals, schools, bomb shelters, kettled the entire population into a tiny parcel of land in the southernmost tip of the country while they finish levelling the rest of Palestine, and stopped all aid, journalists, water, and food entering the country. And then to add insult to injury they bomb the safe zones.

A country’s right to defend itself does not extend to this. This isn’t defence.

Do they expect the civilians with blown off limbs in bombed-out hospitals to walk to these not-so-safe zones? How do they expect the entire population to survive in these cramped conditions with no access to critical food, water, and medicine heading into winter? (Hint: they don’t.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Thank you for saying this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

You can’t be that naive, honestly

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Thats actually a tool of genocide. The whole point of creating the gas chambers was to create an efficient genocide machine. The guards who took the prisoners to the chambers were different from guards who took the bodies. The guards who interacted with the prisoners weren’t allowed to decide who got to live and who did not.

All in all, the chambers gave the guards a sense of “we are just following orders” feeling thus lessening their guilt. Because no matter how cruel it is, the humans will feel guilt.

The calling for evacuation is also a similar tool to lessen the guilt of the soldiers. Afterall, those people who died were told to evacuate therefore their death is on their hands.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Israel declaring everyone should just leave is great and everything but where is safe for them to go?

Its just, to me, the only places they seem to be able to go that might be safe are outside of Palestine but maybe I’m just being cynical.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

That is what “genocide” means.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

And no political consequences.

In fact it’s anti-Semitic to investigate or charge these war crimes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You forgot a ‘not’ in there — German government

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

remember Joe that the average Fritz laid the bar high when it comes to genocide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

I would not be surprised if they did that - and then continued their way south. Israel is clearly out to exterminate the Palestinian people by any means possible, from outright shooting and bombing them to starving them and killing them by witholding medical services.

permalink
report
reply
-10 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

If they would nuke Gaza, they could not occupy it to the Israeli settlers, which are already distributing that land among themselves.

Pushing them around like that keeps them from accessing food, rest, shelter, and medication. It is a tried and tested method used by evil governments all over the earth. Look up “Trail of Tears”. Gaza is the same, just with a forth and back movement. Any Gaza inhabitant that dies of these conditions saves an IDF bullet, and they can claim “it wasn’t us!”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

that is your fantasy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Ask people in Gaza whether this is fantasy or reality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

i don’t doubt that Hamas and affiliated terrorists unleashed a terrible war with its progrom on October 7th also for the people they hide within. but Gazans are not being exterminated. there are currently estimated less than 43,000 combat and civilian casualties from a population of more than 2 million people. that would be a very inefficient extermination and i won’t calculate how long it would take eventually for that non-existing plan to succeed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

Well, they voted Hamas in and got war, now they should remove Hamas and peace would be upon them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points
*

As a (very ashamed) person living in Israel (I find it hard to call myself Israeli) there is no maybe or what ifs about it, Bibi wants to kill every single Palestinian and the Kahanists (ex: Naftali Bennett) want to kill every Muslim. There is no excuse, Israel is a genocidal apartheid state. If I as a person living in Israel can acknowledge that then yall .world users absolutely have no excuse.

permalink
report
reply
5 points
*

For this reason there is the “it’s antisemitic to criticise this war”

Heck even Jews have been accused to be antisemitic for criticising Israel.

We live in a post-facts era

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

At this point it’s like saying “Wait, you want to STOP the Holocaust? Do you just hate Germans or something?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
  • It is not antisemitic to not support Israel
  • It is not against the Israeli people to be antizionist
  • Its especially neither to not support the Israeli government
permalink
report
parent
reply
-24 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 10K

    Monthly active users

  • 8.8K

    Posts

  • 98K

    Comments