The U.S. Copyright Office denied an exemption from the DMCA to allow gaming historians to access out-of-print games they can’t legally get anywhere else.
Complete bullshit. Waste energy and make your own archives then I guess.
Honestly just use an emulator and download the roms. It’s the best way to play anything and if you are tech savvy enough you can actually get a custom handheld device that just runs emulators.
There is something to be said for experiencing the game on its intended hardware. Compare seeing the Mona Lisa to seeing a photo of the Mona Lisa. The image is the same, and for most people, that’s enough. However, there are some minor details you can only get from the real deal.
However, that doesn’t mean that piracy is off the table, just a bit more challenging. Most retro consoles have either an everdrive type cartridge available, or an optical disc emulator that will let you run ROMs on the original hardware with a minor modification to the console. Get one of those and a good quality CRT TV and you’re off to the races.
If you want a solution thats a bit more multi-purpose, then I recommend looking into the MiSTer project, which uses an FPGA to emulate the system at a cycle-accurate chip level, rather than software to read ROMs natively on generic computer hardware.
Mona Lisa is, alas, a terrible example. It’s a (small) painting famous for its very finely blended brush strokes, and yet it’s behind two layers of protective glass, a barrier about five metres away, and there’s generally about ten thousand tourists queuing up to see it. It’s something you go to have seen, rather than to see.
Unless you wanted an example of a retro game that you play to have said you’ve played it, not too actually play, in which case it’s a superb example. Plenty of games that were legendary at the time but who’s gameplay doesn’t hold up any more.
The Louvre has some massive rooms full of Raphael masterpieces and Gericault’s “Raft of the Medusa” just down from the Lisa - those are well worth seeing in the flesh, big pictures that reproduction doesn’t do justice to.
Like I forgot how to napster. Dawg.
The arguments used to make the First Sale Doctrine apply to books a hundred years ago are equally applicable to games and other software, and consumers should demand they’re given the rights they deserve to use the copies of media they’ve paid for. You should be able to sell on a used video game once you’ve finished it, or lend it to a friend, just like you can with a book or a DVD.
That said, the title’s a little misleading. Libraries only lend each copy of a book to one person at a time (if it’s a physical book, it’s pretty obvious that it can only be in one place at once), and the ruling the headline refers to says that a copy of a retro game can only be lent out to one person at once, which is understandable, even if it’s a massive pain when plenty of games don’t have many working copies left in circulation.
This ruling seems insane since libraries can already lend new games. I think mine still has wiiu stuff.
I’m in Canada and my library has everything from brand new ps5 games to GameCube era and original Xbox/PS2. And I live like a block away. They better not mess with that cause I haven’t bought a video game in years
This is the right determination by the USCO. This is a place where the legislature is the party responsible for acting in the face of a clear issue with a clear solution. Congress will fix this, right?