29 points
*

Jesus christ. Not surprised to see yet another dowsing wand being sold for cops, but what kind of a court admits this shit as evidence?

permalink
report
reply
22 points

pretty typical. bloodstain pattern analysis is still accepted by courts despite being fiction. bitemark analysis. to a limited degree parental alienation. etc

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Ever looked into the reliability of fingerprint evidence?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

machine learning can surely fix it

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Bite mark forensics has entered the chat

Anything that can convince a median intelligence jury, will be used by unscrupulous prosecutors and cops.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points
*

hands down, this might truly be the absolute worst use case for an LLM, so no surprise it’s being utilized by cops.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

it is not certain it’s a chatbot - but that kind of confabulation is enough of a tell that I’ll say so

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I have a suspicion, but let me first check with the AI in my phone:

“Cybercheck committed the m-u-r…”, AI suggests “murder”! That is it, case cracked!

As my AI figured out, Cybercheck themselves committed the murders and then probably created their service to cover it up!

permalink
report
reply
2 points

2 Trap 2 Mouser

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 1.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 418

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments

Community moderators