They just crossed the line. Very tight race in the end.

Live tracker here.

3 points

But doesn’t this mean that there will be a runnoff in the November elections, since it didn’t cross 50%?

permalink
report
reply
16 points

That’s for the presidential election. The constitutional changes vote is secure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

What’s the vote about?

permalink
report
reply
45 points

Making EU membership a goal in the Moldovan constitution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

It’s amazing how many big obviously consequential decisions around the world come down to a 50/50 vote lately. Have they perfected propaganda techniques that 49% of people are genetically susceptible to? Or is just that nobody knows what the hell is going on so we all decide completely at random what to believe?

permalink
report
reply
3 points

It would be different without massive Russian interference

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

One of the things I read about that, is that people tend to take an “average position” between all the opinions they hear. It used to be that the opinions you’d hear would be based on serious media, and your close circles. But much of the media has gone to shit, and social media amplify crazy people because it’s good for engagement. So you end up hearing about the crazy position of lore as much as about the rational one. And that does influence a lot of people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Simulation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

There’s probably some truth in “Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Like when people use “average” incorrectly? (You’re talking median here.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Let’s hope the upvote/downvote ratio on that comment doesn’t stay 50:50.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Yes for what? Ah, whether they constitutionally want to join the EU.

A BBC producer at a polling station in Transnistria relayed a first-hand account of a woman asking an election monitor where she could be paid the cash offered to her for her vote

Holy shit, Russia…

permalink
report
reply
2 points

If you have a proper secret vote, then getting paid cash to vote is not a problem. The election judges just need to tell everyone that it is perfectly moral (a stronger case than just legal) to vote for something and collect the cash for voting against.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It is a secret vote. It’s up to the voter to keep it secret.

And also, how is getting paid cash to vote not a problem? It’s quite clearly voter manipulation. Are you Russian?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

He’s saying the hard counter is to tell people the vote is secret. They can vote their way and then tell the person offering cash anything they want to tell them. They are under no moral obligation to tell such criminals the truth.

Elon Musk is finding this out in Arizona and Pennsylvania right now and it’s hilarious.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It was a referendum to make constitutional changes that would allow EU accession.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Not allow for EU accession, the Moldovan government could’ve joined the EU without the referendum. This referendum adds a constitutional requirement for all future Moldovan governments to keep working to join the EU, to basically protect Moldova from being fucked over by a future pro Russian government

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Thanks for the clarification.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

50.3%, that’s clooooose.

permalink
report
reply

Europe

!europe@feddit.org

Create post

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don’t overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don’t post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don’t troll nor incite hatred. Don’t look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia’s List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add “/s” when you’re being sarcastic (and don’t use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They’re cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don’t evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don’t show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

Community stats

  • 3.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.3K

    Posts

  • 8.6K

    Comments