50 points

oh great, commercial eugenics

permalink
report
reply
9 points

We knew it was bound to happen sometime with capitalism

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Better than traditional genocidal eugenics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

(psst. hey buddy. all eugenics is genocidal. It’s in the fucking name. Also. racism and fascism have historically been sanitised and presented as scientific or commercial endeavours. They’re the cornerstones of capitalism. Think of how the weapons industry is printing money because of israel’s decades long genocide against the palestinians.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

how about we aim for no eugenics, not just the least objectionable sort

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

there is no unobjectionable eugenics

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

A depressingly low bar. Also, [Citation Needed]

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

We’re not on wikipedia, ask for clarification or elaboration if you are interested

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

I’m not so sure about that. If they are able to make it generally affordable, they could make quite the impact trough corruption or just keeping things quiet

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

That’s not how IQ works you idiots.

Wait. Who’s the idiots? The ones selling the service, the ones falling for the service, or the embryos that they decide to have low IQ?

I’d say the first two, and if the parents are responsible for the education of the kid, all three.

permalink
report
reply
10 points
*

Re one, what is worse? People selling anti wifi amulets that they know don’t work? Or people who sell them while not understanding (nor believing) that they dont work? (More likely it doesnt matter as it remains a scam. Ow god, im getting close to doing actual ethical thinking here).

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Reminds me of the Wi-Fi blocking Faraday cages to “protect” modems a few years ago. Those at least did exactly what was promised lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Finally a tool to make my lan wifi very local.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

You can sell an anti-wifi amulet that absolutely works. You can also sell an anti-cellular amulet that works, but the FCC will come down on you like a ton of bricks if you use it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Im obv not talking about those devices here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’m pretty sure there’s no jammers out there that qualify as “amulet” sized.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’d say number 2. The people selling the service are scammers, but probably not dumb. Or maybe thet are Idk.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

“Given these three steps, what’s the logical fourth one?”
“…”
“God this embryo is an idiot.”

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Doesn’t even know the basic strats for these pattern questions, SMH, Do You Even IQ Test? (trying to start DYEIQT)

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Good luck having an embryo pass an iq test. Most of them can’t even read.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Legitimately though, it’s a nonsensical metric to screen on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*

The thing with IVF is that it’s already incredibly weirdly eugenicist.

Like, read some of the parameters they’d screen you for if you wanted to donate sperm. You get bonus points for having a PhD? I’m sorry? You’re looking for a better-educated sperm?

And when you apply for IVF and choose a donor you get their education and job. “I want my cum to be a pilot!” The fuck.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Lamarckian eugenics!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

@V0ldek @sue_me_please

IVF isn’t required if fertility concerns or frozen eggs aren’t involved, they can give you the home game.

And it should be no surprise that sperm banks want to be able to compete on the “quality” of their donors.

Just watch out for the bank that is 75% doctor jizz but it’s all from the proprietor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

A fertility doctor here in Sweden took sperm from men who were undergoing investigations for infertiliy and used it as donor sperm.

Imagine their surprise when decades later they found out they had kids.

Not sure why he chose those particular samples, maybe all he had available.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

I think it’s understandable. Intelligence is partly hereditary and people want clever children. Education and job can give you at least an overall idea of the person you’re having a child with. It’s kind of weird anyway to have a child with someone random, isn’t it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

It’s kind of weird anyway to have a child with someone random, isn’t it?

In my mind “being inseminated by” is like 1% of “having a child with”, if that. It’s probably the least consequential thing your father may do in your overall upbringing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

@V0ldek @angrystego

That doesn’t really apply to a guy you only know as Dewar number 27, does it? Raising a child with that person isn’t in the cards except by very unlikely coincidence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

I think for many women “being inseminated by” IS a big thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 1.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 417

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments

Community moderators