57 points
*

What am I looking at (besides a generic neofetch on hardware that can’t load Google.com)

permalink
report
reply
53 points

It’s Bazzite on wildly impractical hardware. I had the installer on my ventoy USB and decided to try and install it on my crapbook for shits and giggles.

No, it doesn’t run well. But to be fair, I also had Firefox open on another desktop with the only open tab being Lemmy.

permalink
report
parent
reply

by crapbook, are you referring to a Chromebook?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

No, sadly, it shipped with windows 8.1. Chrome OS would have at least made sense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

That’s exactly it, Bazzite, a distro associated with gaming, running on hardware that even at release was criticized for being “landfill fodder”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I got a surprising amount of use out of a similarly configured C720 as a general purpose portable machine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

How did you make it usable? I personally love restoring and making use out of severely-underpowered hardware and still have an old netbook lying around, so I’m curious to hear what you did with yours :o

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

hehe funny sex number

(69 Flatpaks)

permalink
report
reply
29 points

Also Linux version 6.9.4-201

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Oooh, I missed that. Nice!

permalink
report
parent
reply

What -fetch program is that?

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Hyfetch

permalink
report
parent
reply

Thanks!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Why? Also you can buy more ram. It isn’t super cheap but it isn’t expensive either.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

I wanted to get more ram for my notebook however it’s soldered to the board with no extra DIMM or storage options.

It’s an old satellite from Toshiba, 4gb ram, dual core intel, 64gb emmc. Serves it’s purpose running a bare bones (ish) install of Nix.

Really hate ewaste hardware.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Ayo 1.47Gb ram consumption on idle ?!

permalink
report
reply
5 points
*

I mentioned this elsewhere but this hyfetch isn’t actually fair to the crapbook. I had Firefox open as well, with Lemmy as the only open tab (so it’s totally usable, who needs to do anything other than post on Lemmy?). It was actually 1.03 Gb ram consumption on the terminal after closing Firefox.

Glados the crapbook is now running bunsenlabs and it’s sitting at 745M on the desktop according to conky.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

745M is still kinda much, when i was using xfce in idle i never reached more than 500M

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

My fedora KDE usee like 1.7G minimum and ~2.5G agter opening some apps and closing all of them

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I dont get why that is really

permalink
report
parent
reply

linuxmemes

!linuxmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:
Community rules
  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

Community stats

  • 7K

    Monthly active users

  • 884

    Posts

  • 14K

    Comments