Much credit to this post.

13 points

excellent post 🫡

permalink
report
reply
12 points

how many felonies did she commit?

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Its not illegal to disproportionately imprison black people for minor drug offenses in the USA, just like slavery was and remains very legal there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Kamala already treats black ppl in practice, how you imagine trump will treat them. She even called black lives matter a russian op. Do you agree with her on that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

LMAO at the amount of “her entire career has been about building and filling internment camps, but at least she doesn’t have the popular support for a soft coup!” in this thread.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

A federal prosecutor has always dedicated her career to building “internment camps” but a literal coup that led to several deaths was “soft”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Several deaths:

six people died: one was shot by Capitol Police, another died of a drug overdose, three died of natural causes, and a police officer died after being assaulted by rioters.

I’ll admit it may technically be a mischaracterization, but I don’t think you understand the level of violence that is typical of “hard” coups.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I just disagree with softening the word by adding “soft” at the beginning. A soft coup is a coup. Date rape is still rape, candy-corn-murder is still murder. No need to add prefixes to try and categorize them, and artificially make some sort of hierarchy.

By naming it any less than a coup, and holding all coups to the same standard, it’s an attempt to soften it, and I am against that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I can’t tell which you’re trying to do, apologize for maga chuds or kamala’s abuse of black people and immigrants.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s right where I want to be. So on the fence you frustratingly want me to just pick any side.

But for your own sanity sake, I prefer to side with society freedoms. I’m too young and broke to care about tax brackets or inflation rate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Yes, she sucks in her own ways. But she’s not a fascist.

permalink
report
reply
-4 points

No, she’s much, much worse, mostly because Russia needs Trump to stop weapons supplies to Ukraine again like he did last time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

A nationalist “tough on crime” anti-socialist with a deep appreciation for cops-for-capitalism pining for a return to “glory days” for a subset of residents while scapegoating others via racist and xenophobic policies? While pushing a genocide? Whose supporters can’t even name the parts of her platform that appeal to them, instead trying to build a cult of personality and identify through who they reject?

To the extent anyone is fascist any longer she’s right up there. But she uses rhetoric that is normalized for liberals and flies under the radar because the oppression she supports is sanitized and “politely” obfuscated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Well worth it to actually click through and read some of the specific articles on topics of interest. The descriptions are not all accurate.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Such as?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Many of these are about a case of a man supposedly throwing a knife under a car, for instance. “A crime he didn’t commit” is inaccurate, it remained very much in question.

https://laist.com/news/kpcc-archive/san-fernando-valley-man-s-freedom-hangs-in-appeal

Really, I recommend reading through any that strike your interest, and not simply trusting the one-shot summaries provided by a random person on the internet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Many of these are about a case of a man supposedly throwing a knife under a car, for instance.

So far as I can tell, a single bullet point is about this, just with multiple links.

“A crime he didn’t commit” is inaccurate, it remained very much in question.

It’s a claim straight from one of the links and I’m gonna go out on a limb here and say that a conviction based solely on cop testimony, later contradicted by other witnesses, with an incompetent defending lawyer that was later disbarred, is plenty enough to make that claim.

Really, I recommend reading through any that strike your interest, and not simply trusting the one-shot summaries provided by a random person on the internet.

Sure, but read them critically and not with a pro-cop bias.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Oh whodathunkit?

permalink
report
parent
reply

United States | News & Politics

!usa@lemmy.ml

Create post

Community stats

  • 4.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.7K

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments