35 points

Good luck to them!

I think the only major contribution to humanity the CCP I would respect would be fusion research.

It’s not complicated, just stupid expensive and politically impossible, but if they can figure it out, they have truly provided a transformative humanity.

permalink
report
reply
33 points

They’re doing pretty well with solar and electric vehicles too

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

And poverty eradication. And high speed rail. And smartphone and chip tech, and space program… kind of a long list.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

If only we dissolved all nation states and lived in communes that best reflect everyones individual values.

Mine would have nukes, because I will never trust humanity, no matter how good things get.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I mean, that’s not the CCP, that’s just the Chinese people working like dogs to profit the corrupt party members.

If that’s true then it is also true that Capitalism didn’t do anything for America either. It was Americans working like dogs for the profit of corrupt leaders.

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points
*

Fusion reactors are incredibly complicated… This is a research reactor, with the goal of figuring out how to create sustainable fusion for real world uses by 2050.

This is not a performative action for a determinative outcome, this is aspirational and has no guarantee of achieving its goals, which is good. This type of research and science needs to be funded, even when it may fail.

Maybe this will spurn competition between powers to accelerate their own fusion reactor research, and create a virtuous cycle that accelerates this technology becoming a major source of green energy in the near, or medium-term, future.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I like democracy, but I don’t like our short-sighted (4-8 year) election-campaign-based governing. But between our public and private sectors I know we can meet this challenge and make this happen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

I disagree on the private sector aspect of this, but I agree on the democracy part. Although, I don’t really view America as true democracy at this moment in history, but that’s besides the point here.

Fusion technology is at a point in its life cycle where it needs to be a public sector project. There is no path to profitability in the near-term, that would justify private sector involvement, except as a means to extract profit from the very expensive research process of even making this technology feasible.

Not that I’m against the private sector within the nuclear power industry. I’m very excited to see what they can do with SMR technology. I’m just extremely skeptical of most private-public partnerships, especially in cases like this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

probably said will be ready in 20-30 years and got mistranslated

permalink
report
reply
-2 points

Probably pulled that out of your ass.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

fusion power will be ready in 20-30 years is a decades old meme

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

It’s a decades old Western capitalist meme.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

Tokamaks are useless.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Tell me you don’t know what you’re talking about without telling me you don’t know what you’re talking about

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

First wall problems compounded by geometric constraints, fueling, magnetic & corresponding mechanical complexities, particularly over long periods of time where material fatigue sets in due to coils applying heavy, dynamic loading… there’s a lot against tokamaks.

They seem to impress people, and we could all use novel research into MHD. But @Blackdoomax@sh.itjust.works is kind of correct.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Man, I wish we (Canada) were that ambitious. I know lemmy hates Elon Musk but I really admire his ambition in technical pursuits. I’m not saying we need more Elon Musks, but we should pursue more grand projects.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

“His” All he does is ketamine and buy-up companies that already exist. His workers have all the ambition, however misplaced.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

These guys are Canadian and I’ve always thought their tech seemed really creative and novel

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Fusion

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Oh nice, fellow Canadians doing the good work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Isn’t fusion power not as clean as people say it is?

The Practicalities of actual fusion reactors make this seem a lot less appealing than I think I grew up hearing.

I’m happy to see china continue to pump resources into their clean energy mix, but at the same time it feels like this entire concept might end up being more of a meme than we think.

permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.ml

Create post

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

Community stats

  • 3.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.2K

    Posts

  • 7.5K

    Comments

Community moderators