38 points
*

Sneers from r/physics! First up, this comment by napqe:

I’m sorry, but this is like awarding the nobel prize for literature to Xerox/HP/Brother for “improvements to printing”.

And in the same thread, from GustapheOfficial:

Last year’s prize was too relevant, they had to stagger the physics by a year.

We also have this by M1st_:

What’s next? Someone gets a Nobel prize for another algorithm that numerically solves differential equations??

Finally, we’ve the title of this thread, by TheSkells:

Yeah, “physics”

permalink
report
reply
36 points

nobel committee went full on ai-brained this year, nobel prize in chemistry is for alphafold. they had three good years in a row, had to do something stupid ig

permalink
report
reply
13 points

lol that’s gonna age like milk

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

still better than peace prize for kissinger

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

i mean they still can give nobel prize in literature to chatgpt for extruding most text in unit of time

this is not my field, but allegedly alphafold kinda works, but it’s also not ai and more pattern matching, something that google does expertly. i still don’t think that it’s gonna be very useful even that it does solve a hard problem

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

half goes to david baker, you might remember him from rosetta@home thing. the other two people are from google deepmind

i guess it’s one of these years when chemistry nobel goes to biologists, but now with layer of ai hype on top for some weird fucking reason

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

So Geoffrey Hinton is a total dork.

Hopefully, [this Nobel Prize] will make me more credible when I say these things really do understand what they’re saying. [There] is a whole school of linguistics that comes from Chomsky that thinks it’s nonsense to say these things understand language. That school is wrong. Neural nets are much better at processing language than anything produced by the Chomsky school of linguistics.

permalink
report
reply
31 points

Neural nets are much better at processing language than anything produced by the Chomsky school of linguistics.

Hey mate, did you get your PhD or a fucking Nobel in linguistics by any chance? No? Just talking about shit you apparently have no idea about?

I didn’t even know you could be a crank about linguistics, that’s pretty amazing. What other otherwise really boring fields are you going to tackle, geodesy?

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points
*

there’s plenty of linguistics cranks, but most of them have nationalistic tint, like people thinking that all languages come from turkish or something like that

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Everybody knows that all languages derive from ULTRAFRENCH.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

You give me a word, any word, and I show you how the root of that word is Greek.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

like people thinking that all languages come from turkish

This is amazing, I fucking love this. People striving to create the lowest stakes possible conspiracy. I struggle to think of something that would have less impact on the world no matter it were true or false.

A shadowy cabal of powerful people guarding the secret of “actually, it was [rolls die] Turkish people who invented [rolls another die] language!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Hey mate, did you get your PhD or a fucking Nobel in linguistics by any chance?

Early onset Nobel disease.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I’m just waiting for him to chime in about music theory.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

A popular meme on social media makes a series of allegations about the musical tune pitch A=432Hz and A=440Hz, including that the latter was a standard imposed by the Nazis to manipulate their enemies.

spittake

Multiple experts told Reuters these allegations are unfounded.

NO WAY

Thanks Reuters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

efficient move, getting the Nobel disease in before the Nobel itself

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Given how much money is being wasted invested in AI, they should have given them the Economics prize.

permalink
report
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Repeating a comment I made in another forum here…


The Nobel organization is basically all about PR, and while as the nominating body they’re nominally independent, the Royal Academy of Science knows on which side their bread is buttered. Having a prize adjacent to AI in the year of our LLM 2024 is a no-brainer.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

Having a prize adjacent to AI in the year of our LLM 2024 is a no-brainer.

This works on multiple levels

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 2.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 323

    Posts

  • 8.6K

    Comments

Community moderators