10 points

Woof after all that time making their slipspace engine? It worked super well! What happened to it?

permalink
report
reply
2 points

I think a lot of high profile people left 343, it was probably the ones that were experts in using it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

my understanding from a tech artist friend was that simple things like adding a new shader would take a day to make it into their continuous integration builds, making it ridiculous compared to unity/unreal/etc. this was 2019-ish

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points
*

Build software using contractors.

Use software to make game using contractors.

Finish game, end contracts with contractors.

Company now has literally no-one on payroll who still knows how to do anything with their “in-house” tools.

Fuck everything up for years, and get literally nothing done, because you keep trying to finish things with a revolving door of contractors who all have to learn to use your in-house crap made by other contractors who aren’t around to answer questions or update documentation.

Switch to UE5 because all the contractors already know how to use it, as you won’t consider hiring actual employees again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Ah yep that makes complete sense, as an ex Microsoft contractor myself I forgot how stupid they are with institutional knowledge. All of their codebases are so cobbled together

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

slipspace was just an iteration of blam with a marketing name slapped on top, and cost them dearly in any case :/

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Huh, looks like a UE5 game.

permalink
report
reply
79 points

Gamer PSA: UE5 does not automatically make a game better or worse, it’s just a set of tools. The game part still has to be made. End PSA.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

True, though it does make the end result better than shittier engines. Like, you could see the “Unity” in Unity games, only a few of them weren’t jank. For UE games, generally I found it to be a bunch more stable bug-wise, same for when I developped my own. No idea how Godot fares now, haven’t tried the engine since my college days, but back then it was cool.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

In Unity you can only remove the start up image if you pay enough. So many small indie titles with little budgets have the start up logo while the bigger productions normally removed them. Before Unity fucked up only a small portion of indies used Unreal so you have to look harder to find that many junk games. I think we will see in the next years a rise on Unreal engine junk games

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Yeaaah, but then again not really, there has been an Unreal scene in indies. I’d say it was a 60-30-10 split between Unity, Unreal and Godot (of people using these engines, not counting custom ones). My point is there is a “character” or “personality” of these engines. It stems from both the factors you mentioned, and the tutorials / sample projects that are in Unreal or Unity. Unreal games quite often have specific lighting that immediately makes you go “Unreal” from looking at a game. I can’t really explain it, it’s like seeing AI photos - sometimes all the fingers, eyes are there but the “uncanny valley” feeling remains. For Unity it always was the “jank” to me, even without seeing any logo and googling afterwards. Probably just confirmation bias on my part, but oh well

Edit: for Unreal another tell is the default “skeleton” animations for a third person character. Some of the cheap asset flips even leave the unreal robot / doll model. It mostly stems from the UE marketplace and people rigging their models with the default skeleton so more anims / custom ones work for it

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Definitely feel your pain in unity. I made a game with it and we had so many technical problems. UE has some major issues too though. None of them are perfect. Godot is getting better and better but it’s still very far from a mature engine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

It does make them feel homogenous, with similar strengths and limitations both visually and mechanically, though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I mean I guess if everyone was using the default settings and buying assets off the unreal store you might get that, but the engine doesn’t come with graphics. You can make whatever you want in it. You could make a ps1 era looking game. You could make something like windwaker. You could make a 2d game. It’s just a set of tools.

Don’t get me wrong, the engine does have strengths and weaknesses, and lends itself better to certain things. That makes games of a certain type gravitate towards it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You can do plenty of lower end stuff and have it feel somewhat distinct, but it takes a lot more to use UE in a 3D game and not make it super obvious it’s unreal. People are responding unfavorably to it being on unreal for a reason. It’s not imagination. It has a lot of flaws that limit games using it unless they take extraordinary measures to overcome them.

The end result is people tired of unreal because the games all fall short in the same ways, because the engine pushes devs into it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s also the camera and lighting. Someone remanded MW2 in Unreal Engine and while it looked better it somehow had a Fortnite feel to it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Generally makes it worse though. It’s an engine built with shortcuts for a ‘good’ looking game. Obviously developers can skip these shortcuts, but rarely do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Changing your studios name doesn’t change the fact that 343i is structurally bankrupt

permalink
report
reply
4 points

They did restructure and fire alot of the old management , so maybe it’s not as bad now

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

O’Connor, Ross, Wolfkill, and several others.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

As long as they bring back couch coop. Honestly, that’s what Halo was all about camaraderie and game play, not visuals.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Agreed

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I remember when Halo was first shown off and being amazed by the graphics. I thought it looked almost like pre-rendered graphics.

Funny how we’re now in an age where the real time graphics look much better than the pre-rendered ones from back then.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Exactly. I bought it to play w/ friends. Shortly after getting Halo: CE, I played through the campaign with a friend in co-op, and we would frequently have XBox parties where we’d have couch tournaments and whatnot.

The visuals were fantastic for the time, but that’s not why I got it at all, and none of my friends seemed to care what it looked like, we just wanted to play team deathmatch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Halo and halo 2 looked incredible for their times

permalink
report
parent
reply

Games

!games@sh.itjust.works

Create post

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc…
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc…)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

Community stats

  • 5.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 4.2K

    Posts

  • 24K

    Comments

Community moderators